From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 14 23:43:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA8316A4CE; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:43:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from prometheus.gangofone.com (wsip-24-234-159-245.lv.lv.cox.net [24.234.159.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7868B43D2D; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:43:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dave@jetcafe.org) Received: from hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org (hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org [64.239.180.8])i2F7hj8u007261; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:43:45 -0800 (PST) X-Hokkshideh-Envelope-To: ru@FreeBSD.org Received: from hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i2F7hquZ071359; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:43:52 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200403150743.i2F7hquZ071359@hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Ruslan Ermilov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:43:52 -0800 From: Dave Hayes X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on prometheus.gangofone.com cc: Jarkko Santala cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 4.8p16 buildworld fails with NO_OPENSSL X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 07:43:58 -0000 Ruslan Ermilov writes: > On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 10:11:06PM -0800, Dave Hayes wrote: >> Ruslan Ermilov writes: >> > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:22:13PM +0200, Jarkko Santala wrote: >> >> Just cvsupped the sources to 4.8p16 from 4.8 and tried to make buildworld >> >> with NO_OPENSSL defined in /etc/make.conf. Here's the result: >> ... >> > This has been fixed in RELENG_4 in src/secure/lib/Makefile,v 1.19.2.5. >> > You can pull up that revision manually, as these fixes won't go into >> > security branches. >> >> I'm using that version and it still appears not to work (modulo my >> naivete): >> >> # cd /usr/src/secure/usr.bin/telnet >> > Why are you doing this? To show that both /usr/src/secure/usr.bin/telnet and /usr/src/usr.bin/telnet have the same failure. I really want the latter to compile and install, but it won't with NO_OPENSSL defined. > You have requested NO_OPENSSL, so no secure version of telnet(1) > will be built. /usr/src/secure/usr.bin/Makefile won't descend into > the "telnet" subdirectory if you specify NO_OPENSSL. Ok, but that doesn't explain why /usr/src/usr.bin/telnet is failing. ;) >> It appears to be looking for libtelnet.a in both cases, which is not >> built if NO_OPENSSL is defined per src/secure/lib/Makefile,v >> 1.19.2.5. (and I am reading the Makefile right). >> Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug? > Yes, you do something wrong. The question is: what? ------ Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - dave@jetcafe.org >>> The opinions expressed above are entirely my own <<< A person being delivered from the danger of a fierce lion does not object whether this service is performed by unknown or illustrious individuals. Why, therefore, do people seek knowledge from celebrities?