From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Oct 9 9:28: 0 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C996037B401; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:27:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from papagena.rockefeller.edu (papagena.rockefeller.edu [129.85.41.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC1043E6A; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:27:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rsidd@papagena.rockefeller.edu) Received: (from rsidd@localhost) by papagena.rockefeller.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g99GRvp17234; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:27:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:27:57 -0400 From: Rahul Siddharthan To: Terry Lambert Cc: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" , chat@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Real UNIX history (was: Congrats to Brett Glass for new BSD hist Message-ID: <20021009122757.F16730@papagena.rockefeller.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3DA3B05D.6DCAD9E8@mindspring.com> X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.9-12smp i686 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Terry Lambert wrote: > > > UNIX was free, too. The consent decree from the Greene decision > > > on the AT&T antitrust case forbit AT&T from making money from > > > selling software. > > > > That didn't make it free. > > No, you;re right. It was the "them not charging for it" that made > it free. 8-). Remind me again -- why was there a flap, across all three BSDs, about Darren Reed's "no modification" licensing of IP Filter around a year ago? He never tried to charge for it, did he? What was that fuss about? - Rahul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message