From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 15 01:19:03 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E549416A41F
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 01:19:03 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bfoz@bfoz.net)
Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F330943D83
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 01:18:52 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bfoz@bfoz.net)
Received: from [192.168.0.5] (c-24-6-134-233.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[24.6.134.233])
	by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP
	id <2005081501185001300ojuv9e>; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 01:18:50 +0000
Message-ID: <42FFED79.5050606@bfoz.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:18:49 -0700
From: Brandon Fosdick <bfoz@bfoz.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050721)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Darren Pilgrim <dmp@bitfreak.org>
References: <001701c5a0a9$ce0b9570$642a15ac@SMILEY>
In-Reply-To: <001701c5a0a9$ce0b9570$642a15ac@SMILEY>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: IRQ conflict between twa0 and skc0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 01:19:04 -0000

Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> I believe the IEEE was involved. :)

That explains a lot :)

> IRQ sharing is a known issue with many RAID cards and even some gigabit
> ethernet cards.  It seems to correlate to cards that push the
> performance limit of the bus.

And here I am with both a RAID card and a gigabit ethernet chip. Fortunately the slot swap seems to have sorted everything out.