Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      03 May 2000 18:12:49 -0700
From:      asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami)
To:        kiri@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp
Cc:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: USE_AUTOMAKE directive
Message-ID:  <vqc8zxrxgmm.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
In-Reply-To: kiri@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp's message of "Thu, 04 May 2000 01:01:50 %2B0900"
References:  <200005031547.AAA26484@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp> <200005031601.BAA26617@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 * From: kiri@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp

 * Oh!!! That's upside-down. Sorry, again put it

That's fine.  We can all read patches forwards or backwards. :)

However, is it necessary?  It doesn't seem like a whole lot of ports
use automake anyway.

===
>> grep -c automake-1.4 /usr/ports/INDEX 
6
>> grep -c autoconf-2.13 /usr/ports/INDEX 
61
===

Well, maybe 6 is enough.  What do others think?

Satoshi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqc8zxrxgmm.fsf>