From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed May  3 18:12:58 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from maynard.mail.mindspring.net (maynard.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.243])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C40337B66B
	for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  3 May 2000 18:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca7-07.ix.netcom.com [209.109.235.7])
	by maynard.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA11246;
	Wed, 3 May 2000 21:12:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id SAA60778; Wed, 3 May 2000 18:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
To: kiri@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp
Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: USE_AUTOMAKE directive
References: <200005031547.AAA26484@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp> <200005031601.BAA26617@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp>
From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami)
Date: 03 May 2000 18:12:49 -0700
In-Reply-To: kiri@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp's message of "Thu, 04 May 2000 01:01:50 +0900"
Message-ID: <vqc8zxrxgmm.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
Lines: 19
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.6
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

 * From: kiri@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp

 * Oh!!! That's upside-down. Sorry, again put it

That's fine.  We can all read patches forwards or backwards. :)

However, is it necessary?  It doesn't seem like a whole lot of ports
use automake anyway.

===
>> grep -c automake-1.4 /usr/ports/INDEX 
6
>> grep -c autoconf-2.13 /usr/ports/INDEX 
61
===

Well, maybe 6 is enough.  What do others think?

Satoshi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message