From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 00:08:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F92216A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:08:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from khaled.abu@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F359A43D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:08:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from khaled.abu@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so702662wri for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:08:17 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FPgfoOdCrwmNSZmm6QfB437ZnjLRcfSVd078Af2lAQ2bCQRjhdORYo6t5bO5duAOxBX3NTi2p7Lw18gMyn111+bBnl6i+VYZlKfCEvy0SfpfM+ervWBv5dQxwaVtN9qhdUH+izsIFoiKa+dS+sgEgnQKG5kHl1fiih56eseQAoU= Received: by 10.54.37.72 with SMTP id k72mr1796366wrk; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:08:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.66.16 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:08:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:08:17 +0300 From: Abu Khaled To: Jack Raats In-Reply-To: <000e01c58f6b$20bc9670$9800000a@jara2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <000e01c58f6b$20bc9670$9800000a@jara2> Cc: FreeBSD Stable , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trouble with PHP4-extensions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Abu Khaled List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:08:18 -0000 On 7/23/05, Jack Raats wrote: > I had installed Apache, PHP4.40 and imap on a FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE server. = It worked OK. I had to recompile IMAP and after this apache refuses to star= t. I have to recompile the php4-imap part of php. >=20 > How to do this? > Deinstall php4 completely and then reinstall it > or > Can i use the extensions to recompile only a part? >=20 > Met vriendelijke groeten > Jack Raats Why don't you use sysutils/portmanager or sysutils/portupgrade in the ports directory. These utilities do a good job at solving such problems and you might have other php4-extensions that need updating. --=20 Regards. Abu Khaled From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 00:11:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6A516A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:11:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from greg@grokking.org) Received: from herbert.sohotech.ca (herbert.sohotech.ca [206.116.63.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A8A43D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:11:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from greg@grokking.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by herbert.sohotech.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2851893F8 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:11:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from herbert.sohotech.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (herbert.sohotech.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02666-01 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.11.2] (niven.sohotech.ca [192.168.11.2]) by herbert.sohotech.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AC7175C4A for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42E2DCAC.3060700@grokking.org> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:11:24 -0700 From: Greg Maruszeczka User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200507231237.44829.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> In-Reply-To: <200507231237.44829.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sohotech.ca Subject: [OT Re: SPAM Problem] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:11:29 -0000 Aaron Siegel wrote: > Hello > > This message is off topic but I was not sure were else I can go to get help > with my problem. For the past week I have been receiving messages from > various mail servers which have bounced messages I have not sent but have my > email address as the originator of the bounced message. I believe there are > some SPAMers using my email address on their SPAM. I would really like to > avoid changing my domain name. Has anyone experienced this problem? Is there > something I can do? > It's probably "blowback" resulting from the activities of worm-infected windows hosts. Someone you correspond with got infected and the worm subsequently propagated itself by picking your name from their address book and inserting it into the from: header of the message carrying the worm. Then, badly configured MTAs send "helpful" NDRs to the "sender" informing them that they're messages couldn't be delivered Pretty routine, really. G From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 00:14:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4E216A41F; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:14:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04B343D48; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:14:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854F3997928; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:14:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 86626-01; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:14:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [80.98.156.20] (catv-50629c14.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.156.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10194997561; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:14:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E2DD50.4090304@t-hosting.hu> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:14:08 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jack Raats References: <000e01c58f6b$20bc9670$9800000a@jara2> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Cc: FreeBSD Stable , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trouble with PHP4-extensions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:14:21 -0000 On 7/23/05, Jack Raats wrote: >I had installed Apache, PHP4.40 and imap on a FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE server. It worked OK. I had to recompile IMAP and after this apache refuses to start. I have to recompile the php4-imap part of php. > >How to do this? >Deinstall php4 completely and then reinstall it >or >Can i use the extensions to recompile only a part? > >Met vriendelijke groeten >Jack Raats > Just delete only php4-imap with pkg_delete, then mkdir to /usr/ports/lang/php4-extensions and make config. Make only imap part selected and make FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=YES install. Cheers, Gábor Kövesdán From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 00:35:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A8016A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:35:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hornetmadness@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B9C43D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:35:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hornetmadness@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 34so73510rns for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:35:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aSSnZDlGi5SL5sn3NLZorxb4lB/4FS38hswkD37QUuOsfwxefiARdxa1KxvJd8tRGzF9uEN3JcuOYL/acHrkGVMe6PB1V3Hc81HRvevbIECd8J3r5/s2vAwcNyFTTEAa6lRMbz6EtPLN8YOxQVObN+1jVcFFUaiAma8r0wjr3Bg= Received: by 10.38.103.16 with SMTP id a16mr72509rnc; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:35:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.8.44 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:35:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:35:34 -0400 From: Hornet To: Greg Maruszeczka In-Reply-To: <42E2DCAC.3060700@grokking.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200507231237.44829.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> <42E2DCAC.3060700@grokking.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [OT Re: SPAM Problem] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Hornet List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:35:35 -0000 On 7/23/05, Greg Maruszeczka wrote: > Aaron Siegel wrote: > > Hello > > > > This message is off topic but I was not sure were else I can go to get = help > > with my problem. For the past week I have been receiving messages from > > various mail servers which have bounced messages I have not sent but ha= ve my > > email address as the originator of the bounced message. I believe there= are > > some SPAMers using my email address on their SPAM. I would really like = to > > avoid changing my domain name. Has anyone experienced this problem? Is= there > > something I can do? > > >=20 > It's probably "blowback" resulting from the activities of worm-infected > windows hosts. Someone you correspond with got infected and the worm > subsequently propagated itself by picking your name from their address > book and inserting it into the from: header of the message carrying the > worm. Then, badly configured MTAs send "helpful" NDRs to the "sender" > informing them that they're messages couldn't be delivered >=20 > Pretty routine, really. >=20 > G > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >=20 Yeah, that should, for the most part blow over is a few weeks. In the mean time just filter to the trash. If it to big of problem, you can always delete the NDR's from your mailbox using a script on a cron job. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 00:45:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4E416A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:45:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au) Received: from smtp.ade.swiftdsl.com.au (smtp.ade.swiftdsl.com.au [218.214.228.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AA0243D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:45:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au) Received: (qmail 1548 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2005 00:45:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO daemon.foo.lan) (218.214.176.70) by smtp.ade.swiftdsl.com.au with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 00:45:48 -0000 From: Ian Moore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:15:36 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1202503.WjijGjKbcC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200507241015.45698.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> Cc: "Anthony M. Agelastos" Subject: Re: py24-numeric upgrade woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:45:50 -0000 --nextPart1202503.WjijGjKbcC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 23 July 2005 21:49, Anthony M. Agelastos wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I CVSup'd my tree and did a portupgrade -arR and noticed that > py24-numeric failed to update. To make a long story short, it unpacks > Numeric into /usr/ports/math/py-numeric/work/Numeric-23.8, where the > Makefile (or something) expects the first letter in Numeric to be > lowercase (there is a file inside of the work directory named > numeric-23.8 that is 1234555 bytes). See below for my output. I checked > the mailing list and the bug reports to see if this had been previously > mentioned and I could not find any evidence supporting that, so if it > has been mentioned, I do apologize. > Hi, I have a problem compiling this port too, after last night's cvsup. Here's = the=20 output of my build: =2D--> Upgrading 'py24-numeric-23.7' to 'py24-numeric-23.8' (math/py-numer= ic) =2D--> Building '/usr/ports/math/py-numeric' =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for python-2.4.1_2 =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for py24-numeric-23.8 =3D=3D=3D> Extracting for py24-numeric-23.8 =3D> Checksum OK for Numeric-23.8.tar.gz. =3D> Checksum OK for numpy.pdf. =3D=3D=3D> Patching for py24-numeric-23.8 =3D=3D=3D> Applying FreeBSD patches for py24-numeric-23.8 patch: **** can't cd to /usr/ports/math/py-numeric/work/numeric-23.8: Not a= =20 directory =3D> Patch patch-Src_umathmodule.c failed to apply cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/math/py-numeric. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade40145.= 0=20 make ** Fix the problem and try again. Cheers, =2D-=20 Ian gpg key: http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~imoore/no-spam.asc --nextPart1202503.WjijGjKbcC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC4uS5PUlnmbKkJ6ARAkhTAJ4t0LMuMBqitbf2XQP7+J87dhUX8gCfbEUk 0uRtpbUlURMrceXOjRzYgy0= =beyD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1202503.WjijGjKbcC-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 01:08:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D50216A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 01:08:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from mail.efacilitas.de (efacilitas.de [213.133.110.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBFE43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 01:08:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by mail.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC831239CE; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:13:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1B112B136; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:08:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19298-07; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:08:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id F088712B09A; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:08:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E2E9EF.9060707@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:07:59 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Moore References: <200507241015.45698.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200507241015.45698.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Cc: "Anthony M. Agelastos" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: py24-numeric upgrade woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 01:08:26 -0000 You can fix this temporarily if you add the line WRKSRC= ${WRKDIR}/Numeric-${PORTVERSION} to Makefile, e.g. just before .include in line 28. I sent a mail to the maintainer yesterday. Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 03:23:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814B416A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:23:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3187943D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:23:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localdomain [70.98.247.55] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A995109F00DE; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:23:01 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6O3NwAM035776; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:23:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6O3Nq4A035775; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:23:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Ima Camper References: <20050723181901.79329.qmail@web30001.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:23:52 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20050723181901.79329.qmail@web30001.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (Ima Camper's message of "Sat, 23 Jul 2005 11:19:01 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Syntax for fdisk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:23:01 -0000 Ima Camper writes: > While trying to solve another problem, a suggested fix > was to issue the following command: > > bsdlabel -B da0s1a I'm no expert, but I'll give it a shot. (I'll be using disk for disk, partition for slice (like the rest of the world), and sub-partiton for FreeBSD-partition.) AFAIK, you should never try to label a subpartion like da0s1a (or da0a for a D.D. disk), but only a partition like da0s1 or a D.D. disk like da0. You say that you set it up as a DD disk, so yes, you should have used "bsdlabel -B /dev/da0" > I've booted using the 5.4 IS0 CD and selected fixit > from the sysinstall program. Using fdisk to check > /dev/da0 I see all 4 slices marked as "UNUSED". > However on /dev/da1 that was fdisked the same, the > first slice has information. I don't remember what a DD disk looks like in fdisk, but I wouldn't be suprised if a disk with one partition looked the same whether it had a partition table with one used entry or a truly DD disk with no partition table. > At the fixit prompt, I can mount /dev/da0 and see all > my data. Is there a way to use fdisk from the command > line to restore slice 1 without losing all my data? > What would be the correct syntax? Am I on the right > track? You shouldn't be able to mount /dev/da0, just /dev/da0a, and whatever other subpartitions da0 has. Assuming that you meant that, then if you can mount it, I'd guess it probably has an OK disklabel. Look (with "bsdlabel ad0"). My guess is that the previous labeling attempt wrote something where the first non-DD partition should be located and messed up one of your boot files. If that's the case, you're going to need another disk with a running OS to re-install the OS to the corrupted disk. I hope I'm wrong. Or could it be that you did a "boot0cfg" so the boot loader thinks the OS is on da0s1 instead of da0? Maybe try running that correctly from fixit. Finally, I also wouldn't be suprised if use of a DD disk has been utterly broken, since there seems to be great antipathy towards use of it, in the documentation and installer. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 03:24:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2909C16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:24:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.no-ip.com) Received: from nawcom.no-ip.com (adsl-69-208-115-218.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [69.208.115.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D768643D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:24:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.no-ip.com) Received: from [192.168.212.8] (unknown [192.168.212.8]) by nawcom.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6242864B2; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:49:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42E30A05.2050108@nawcom.no-ip.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:24:53 -0400 From: nawcom User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Perttu Laine References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: making dvd from videos. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:24:53 -0000 i usually use transcode to do the "transcoding" for video to vcd mpeg compliant format, and also for pulling the decoded video off of dvds to the format of my liking. it's run by command line. if you try it lemme know if you need help. http://www.transcoding.org/cgi-bin/transcode Ben Perttu Laine wrote: >Hello! > >I need software to make dvd out of many divx, xvid, mpeg etc. video >files. What I'd like to is convert them either to vcd or svcd and then >make them dvd with simple menu. Which softwares I need for this? > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 03:42:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D664A16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:42:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: from coe.ufrj.br (roma.coe.ufrj.br [146.164.53.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449DE43D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:42:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by coe.ufrj.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD3817008; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:42:26 -0300 (BRT) Received: from coe.ufrj.br ([146.164.53.65]) by localhost (roma.coe.ufrj.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 49879-06; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:42:20 -0300 (BRT) Received: from [200.217.89.237] (unknown [200.217.89.237]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by coe.ufrj.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0FD17003; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:42:19 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <42E30DFF.4050000@jonny.eng.br> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:41:51 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Gary W. Swearingen" References: <42DE8877.6050808@jonny.eng.br> <8xoe8x9qtu.e8x@mail.opusnet.com> <42DFAF63.5080708@jonny.eng.br> In-Reply-To: Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAADBQ TFRFAAAAgAAAAIAAgIAAAACAgACAAICAgICAwMDA/wAAAP8A//8AAAD//wD/AP//////ex+xxAAA Ac9JREFUOMtdk8FupDAMhr1qRbjR2x77GD3uq7BS1TkuhyrmFnppcvOrUlUquXltJ2EAIw1Dvvz+ bRPgrQbU6NpzuY0AF1LABIc4AH9crxLwb/4VztEU42W9SOBezwX4ClzeLuC9PBFRq+2xpJJHN8KQ Oa9Hd/ACnldgUVADvgHKA2usVwW12BVSkrThJH+5lqqQXIAAvRkQM6WqkADpO5gBx5m5VOxRgBZV HRLRcgc4dv3ukbOBm3de8uHIe1n0BBUBIi4hi0U2ownGkkwrwN425ygVPjntsvOmkFyyXYfreHXq f1tugFLCFDhZcsffYIqxKNAB/FkNbBDslUTz0MMQfuRnkN6D5nLVQ0G2H3bWC6KByTZPZWhJ/jgs ChX3e/P5y0VReCUCYm0/pUQd1lQ4/aIty/YtW6y3WMHc8yazpcU8UuqqB+LfMql/wVx4kXNTwGQO PxTuL7+AhbSkWS4z0TdZFbo1BR6qQkA08DnogNNHey/SGc5GejqFttxhjBHd3rjd62nR08gnxeFr Ic2e52we+QC0rIg6KYn1AKQsbF3wcgAP00MZrZ6X0yc5v5TRXgTi/jtVwef5I6Y+J7kyb+d1eB6K 4LoOLphBW/8PdNW9dapKWXwAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at coe.ufrj.br Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nForce3 SMB and Power Management X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:42:29 -0000 Gary W. Swearingen wrote: > João Carlos Mendes Luis writes: > > >>gaia::root ~ [647] mbmon -I >>No ISA-IO HWM available!! >>InitMBInfo: Unknown error: 0 >>gaia::root ~ [648] > > > I don't get that with -I (just with -S). It pretends to work OK; just bad data, > which might be related to the bogus temp. seen in BIOS setup screen. > > >>none0@pci0:1:1: class=0x0c0500 card=0x813f1043 chip=0x00e410de rev=0xa1 hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' >> device = 'nForce PCI SMB Controller' >> class = serial bus >> subclass = SMBus > > > I get: > > ichsmb0@pci0:1:1: class=0x0c0500 card=0x0c111458 chip=0x00e410de rev=0xa1 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' > device = 'nForce PCI System Management' > class = serial bus > subclass = SMBus What's your FreeBSD version? At 5-stable, ichsmb attachs only to Intel devices, that means that only chips numered 0x????8086 are accepted: /* PCI unique identifiers */ #define ID_82801AA 0x24138086 #define ID_82801AB 0x24238086 #define ID_82801BA 0x24438086 #define ID_82801CA 0x24838086 #define ID_82801DC 0x24C38086 #define ID_82801EB 0x24D38086 #define ID_6300ESB 0x25a48086 I'll give it a try, anyway. Maybe compiling a kernel with ALL smb devices. > It looks like I got at least one correct driver (ichsmb) in the kernel > and that you didn't. I don't know what to make of the different "device" > strings, or whether that's from the kernel or the MB. > > I see a couple more SMB things in /sys/conf/NOTES that don't sound > necessary, but I'll probably try; namely, > > options NETSMB #SMB/CIFS requester > options LIBMCHAIN > options LIBICONV > options SMBFS #SMB/CIFS filesystem These are for the SMB/CIFS filesystem, which is the network filesystem used by MS Windows networks. These are not related to power control. > > Here's what I've got now: > > device smbus > device smb # requires smbus > #options ENABLE_ALART # Control alarm on Intel intpm driver [machine=i386]; Not a typo! > device iicbus > device iicbb # requires iicbus > > device ichsmb > device ic > device iic > device alpm > device amdpm > device intpm # requires smb > device viapm > device pcf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 03:47:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E09F16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:47:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.no-ip.com) Received: from nawcom.no-ip.com (adsl-69-208-115-218.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [69.208.115.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2303E43D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:47:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.no-ip.com) Received: from [192.168.212.8] (unknown [192.168.212.8]) by nawcom.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3B96722; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:11:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42E30F39.4050804@nawcom.no-ip.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:47:05 -0400 From: nawcom User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Perttu Laine References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: making dvd from videos. (- hey you're lucky!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:47:05 -0000 heres a script for converting your classic codec based avi file to a VOB file for burning onto a DVD. i didnt test the program out, but i did check to make sure it's freebsd compatible. and luckly all of the needed programs are in /usr/ports/multimedia. You're lucky! http://inferno.slug.org/cgi-bin/wiki?AviToVob it looks like it does the following: -1. use mencoder to pull the video out of its container format or codec, -2. use mplayer to extract the audio channels into a separate file -3. converts the audio into an MP2 file -4. use transcode to convert the new avi into a VCD/SVCD compliant m2v file -5. use mplex to group the m2v and mp2 file to a full working mpg -6. use dvdauthor to make a legit folder containing the video file, title info, etc. im sure you can modify it to your needs. -7. use mkisofs to create an iso file out of the folder -8. use dvdrecord to burn the fucker. 8 steps in one shell script. not that bad huh. i may bookmark this page for future use. -Ben ================================== Perttu Laine wrote: >Hello! > >I need software to make dvd out of many divx, xvid, mpeg etc. video >files. What I'd like to is convert them either to vcd or svcd and then >make them dvd with simple menu. Which softwares I need for this? > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 03:53:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA5C16A420 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:53:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptaylor@addressplus.net) Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.202.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1060D43D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:53:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptaylor@addressplus.net) Received: from addressplus.net (c-24-129-120-74.hsd1.fl.comcast.net[24.129.120.74]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <2005072403530501400k6rq2e>; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:53:05 +0000 Received: from [192.168.111.99] ([192.168.111.99]) by addressplus.net ([127.0.0.1]) with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v6.5.2.R) for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:53:12 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Paul Taylor Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:51:49 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.111.99 X-Return-Path: ptaylor@addressplus.net X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: DHCP3 Server on FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:53:06 -0000 Hi, I'm new to FreeBSD, so there is a good possibility that this is just something stupid that I'm doing wrong... I've had bad timing with linux software that I've tried installing in the past (just happened to try to install while there was a broken distribution, etc.) and I'm starting to think that is my situation here... I'm trying to install the ports version of isc-dhcp3-server... According to what I've read, it should be as simple as: cd /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server make (Set options in the dialog box, in my case unselect everything, then let it run the config, make, etc.) install -s work/dhcp-*/work.freebsd/server/dhcpd /usr/local/sbin Now, my problem starts with the make... When I run it, this is what I get: # make ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> Found saved configuration for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 => dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/. fetch: ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/dhcp-3.0- history/. dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz 100% of 833 kB 408 kBps ===> Extracting for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 => Checksum OK for dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz. ===> Patching for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 ===> Configuring for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 Unexpected argument: server System Type: --subsys No build directory for freebsd - please run ./configure. ===> Building for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 make: don't know how to make all.server. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server. So, it looks like it works correctly up until the Configure section... This output: Unexpected argument: server System Type: --subsys No build directory for freebsd - please run ./configure. is from the Configure script, in the /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server/ work/dhcp-3.0.2 directory... It doesn't appear to be expecting the "--subsys server" that is passed. Now, I ran a "make -n" to get the actual commands that it is issuing, and it does appear to be running "./configure --subsys server" and I also noticed that the last make it runs is: "make -f Makefile all.server". That probably explains the "make: don't know how to make all.server. Stop" error... Now, the real question is how to I fix this? Am I missing some sort of environment variable? Is this port broken? Also, note that I have tried manually running ./configure and performing a "make all"... But I get this far in the make, then: make: don't know how to make omshell.c. Stop *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server/work/dhcp-3.0.2/work.freebsd. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server/work/dhcp-3.0.2. So, I'm hoping someone out there can assist me... Thanks, Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 04:34:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2453F16A420 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 04:34:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD84443D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 04:34:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.247.55] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id AA6D18D30122; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 21:34:53 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6O4ZM8P000938; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 21:35:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6O4ZDd2000937; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 21:35:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= References: <42DE8877.6050808@jonny.eng.br> <8xoe8x9qtu.e8x@mail.opusnet.com> <42DFAF63.5080708@jonny.eng.br> <42E30DFF.4050000@jonny.eng.br> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 21:35:13 -0700 In-Reply-To: <42E30DFF.4050000@jonny.eng.br> =?iso-8859-1?q?=28Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs's?= message of "Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:41:51 -0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Total weight between 10 and 14. X-Spam-Tests-Failed: SPAMDOMAINS, SPFf, WEIGHT10 [11] Cc: questions@freebsd.org, "Gary W. Swearingen" Subject: Re: nForce3 SMB and Power Management X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 04:34:49 -0000 João Carlos Mendes Luís writes: > What's your FreeBSD version? At 5-stable, ichsmb attachs only to Intel devices, > that means that only chips numered 0x????8086 are accepted: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE i386 arch OS on Athlon64 CPU. I don't know about my chips. There are some other numbers than the ones you mentioned in the ichsmb manpage. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 04:36:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C79916A420 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 04:36:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from piccollo.p6m7g8.net (c66-236-219-70.ip.panth.com [66.236.219.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB8E43D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 04:36:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from [192.168.0.203] (pcp09579105pcs.rtchrd01.md.comcast.net [69.244.86.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by piccollo.p6m7g8.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6O4anh3001381 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:36:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Message-ID: <42E31ADB.7080405@p6m7g8.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:36:43 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Afterstep2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 04:36:58 -0000 I've been running afterstep for years now. since the 1.8.x version The 2.0.x version is even better, but versions after afterstep-2.00.00 seem to hang during startup as run as other then root. I've duplicated this on 3 different computers and freebsd versions( 5.3-R, 5.4-R, 6.0-C) Has anyone else experienced this. I know the ports at 2.1.1, but I can't get that high. Thanks in advance. END ------------------------------------------------------------ What doesn't kill us can only make us stronger. Nothing is impossible. Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) 301.254.5198 Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/ Senior Developer / Liquidity Services, Inc. http://www.liquidityservicesinc.com http://www.liquidation.com http://www.uksurplus.com http://www.govliquidation.com http://www.gowholesale.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 05:01:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDD516A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 05:01:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lei.sun@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06ACD43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 05:01:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lei.sun@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 55so781250wri for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 22:01:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=UNPWP3eXdbjSPov30/zjaXziip9d+61awqVHKkmvkFio+6EFScROxTAHdFgsq2DG87lXalFV9W28bFH6iZlTTXMLQXAkB17h6BXJdPtR204netKrB6SpBGsUsaOEjErMJDLuwLs1VeAHU6RFopVGnohMxR/T9DltsqnbGRat7CQ= Received: by 10.54.43.63 with SMTP id q63mr1768039wrq; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 22:01:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.6.70 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 22:01:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 22:01:47 -0700 From: Lei Sun To: questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: turck-mmcache-2.4.6 disappeared from ports tree? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lei Sun List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 05:01:48 -0000 Hi, I am wondering why turck-mmcache-2.4.6 disappeared from the ports tree in 5.4, and later on I found out that it disppeared in 5.3 as well. Will it make its way back to the ports tree? Any Ideas? Thanks in advance. Lei From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 05:16:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318CC16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 05:16:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m@MHoerich.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A94D43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 05:16:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m@MHoerich.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2005 05:16:52 -0000 Received: from p548B5ED7.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO localhost) [84.139.94.215] by mail.gmx.net (mp021) with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 07:16:52 +0200 X-Authenticated: #5114400 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:16:48 +0200 From: Mario Hoerich To: aj@siegel-tech.net Message-ID: <20050724051648.GA4119@Pandora.MHoerich.de> References: <20050721070434.254A11D930@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> <200507231250.16501.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200507231250.16501.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: undelete in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 05:16:56 -0000 # Aaron Siegel: [ there is no un-rm ] > > One option I have seen for creating your own restore is to create a script > that will move files you want to delete to a temporary directory, a "Trash > Bin". Then use your shells aliases to alias the script to the rm command. Don't *ever* create aliases for rm(1). rm's sole purpose in life is to destroy files. If you tame it, you'll eventually adapt and rm with less caution. There are lots of people who eventually got bitten by that when working on a machine other than their own. A better way is to use a name like "[tT]rash" or "tt" (=[move] to trash). That way, when working on a machine without your script, you'll get a nice and friendly "command not found" reminding you there's no safety catch. I'm personally none too fond of this, though. Unixoid systems have quite a lot of ways to destroy files. Trashes won't really protect you from that. Instead, they just give you a false feeling of security, which merely encourages sloppiness. My own solution is actually quite simple: I treat dangerous commands the same way I'd carry a deadly and pretty annoyed snake: with my thoughts on the task at hand. I read the command *before* I hit enter. Not the one I *think* I've written, but the one I'm about to execute. I also tend to tab-expand globs to see which files are actually affected. YMMV, though. Cheers, Mario From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 05:24:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E5916A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 05:24:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A70A43D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 05:24:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j6O5O8GS048000; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:24:08 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:24:08 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Lei Sun Message-ID: <20050724052408.GA84902@dan.emsphone.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: turck-mmcache-2.4.6 disappeared from ports tree? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 05:24:10 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 23), Lei Sun said: > Hi, > > I am wondering why turck-mmcache-2.4.6 disappeared from the ports tree > in 5.4, and later on I found out that it disppeared in 5.3 as well. > > Will it make its way back to the ports tree? port moved to www/eaccelerator on 2005-01-19 REASON: project changed name -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 07:10:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B6716A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:10:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org (nezlok.unixathome.org [66.154.97.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B20E43D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:10:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B65D56B1 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:10:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nezlok.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 60861-10 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:10:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 50E495608; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:10:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050724071003.50E495608@nezlok.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:10:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2005-07-03 - 2005-07-23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:10:18 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 07:46:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7888C16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:46:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CD643D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:46:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6O7kfMx014507 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:46:42 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050724003611.19c20a20@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:42:50 -0700 To: Paul Taylor , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: DHCP3 Server on FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:46:45 -0000 At 08:51 PM 7/23/2005, Paul Taylor wrote: >Hi, > >I'm new to FreeBSD, so there is a good possibility that this is just >something stupid that I'm doing wrong... I've had bad timing with >linux software that I've tried installing in the past (just happened >to try to install while there was a broken distribution, etc.) and >I'm starting to think that is my situation here... > >I'm trying to install the ports version of isc-dhcp3-server... >According to what I've read, it should be as simple as: > >cd /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server >make >(Set options in the dialog box, in my case unselect everything, then >let it run the config, make, etc.) >install -s work/dhcp-*/work.freebsd/server/dhcpd /usr/local/sbin > >Now, my problem starts with the make... When I run it, this is what >I get: > ># make >===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found >===> Found saved configuration for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 >=> dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. >=> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/. >fetch: ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz: File unavailable >(e.g., file not found, no access) >=> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/dhcp-3.0- history/. >dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz 100% of 833 kB 408 kBps >===> Extracting for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 >=> Checksum OK for dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz. >===> Patching for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 >===> Configuring for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 >Unexpected argument: server >System Type: --subsys >No build directory for freebsd - please run ./configure. >===> Building for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 >make: don't know how to make all.server. Stop >*** Error code 2 > >Stop in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server. > >So, it looks like it works correctly up until the Configure section... > >This output: > >Unexpected argument: server >System Type: --subsys >No build directory for freebsd - please run ./configure. > >is from the Configure script, in the /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server/ >work/dhcp-3.0.2 directory... It doesn't appear to be expecting the >"--subsys server" that is passed. > >Now, I ran a "make -n" to get the actual commands that it is issuing, >and it does appear to be running "./configure --subsys server" and I >also noticed that the last make it runs is: "make -f Makefile >all.server". That probably explains the "make: don't know how to >make all.server. Stop" error... > >Now, the real question is how to I fix this? Am I missing some sort >of environment variable? Is this port broken? > >Also, note that I have tried manually running ./configure and >performing a "make all"... But I get this far in the make, then: > >make: don't know how to make omshell.c. Stop >*** Error code 1 > >Stop in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server/work/dhcp-3.0.2/work.freebsd. >*** Error code 1 > >Stop in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server/work/dhcp-3.0.2. > >So, I'm hoping someone out there can assist me... I just built the same port with the same options, and it built without error, so I don't think the port is broken. I did notice this line in your output: Found saved configuration for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 which would indicate that it is using options from a previous install. You might want to do a make clean in the ports dir, then rm -R /var/db/ports/isc-dhcp3-server to get rid of the old config. Then try a make install and see if builds correctly. -Glenn >Thanks, >Paul > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 08:04:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490FC16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:04:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lei.sun@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975E243D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:04:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lei.sun@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 55so797567wri for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 01:04:17 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LmA0kQ8TQ0c8Yd/OQ8UE2DA3e7UpfTdPmp5O1tOs+L4aeosm8z7JKNeelp3T9NLqrB+aZUoromloa7O58LJMeRKqiSDEhZCusaOWKUCP8vrvOF+7qbfD2cIr5Iuh9l3QyhtR7bJqBHphmgEbdaRFXMDdfunjNPC5e/T9GgTY+Rc= Received: by 10.54.11.70 with SMTP id 70mr1797680wrk; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 01:04:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.6.70 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 01:04:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 01:04:16 -0700 From: Lei Sun To: Dan Nelson In-Reply-To: <20050724052408.GA84902@dan.emsphone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050724052408.GA84902@dan.emsphone.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: turck-mmcache-2.4.6 disappeared from ports tree? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lei Sun List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:04:18 -0000 Thanks a lot :) On 7/23/05, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jul 23), Lei Sun said: > > Hi, > > > > I am wondering why turck-mmcache-2.4.6 disappeared from the ports tree > > in 5.4, and later on I found out that it disppeared in 5.3 as well. > > > > Will it make its way back to the ports tree? >=20 > port moved to www/eaccelerator on 2005-01-19 > REASON: project changed name >=20 > -- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 08:49:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A020416A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:49:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4C543D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:49:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 1684 invoked by uid 510); 24 Jul 2005 08:51:17 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.86.1/957. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-1.6/5.0):. Processed in 1.877364 secs); 24 Jul 2005 08:51:17 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-1.6/5.0):. Processed in 1.877364 secs Process 1675) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 08:51:15 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1122195075.1041.2.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:51:15 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Reverting Ports 5.4 -> 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:49:07 -0000 Hi, As I have been having problems with 5.4 on my Compaq Pl5000, I would like to go back to 5.3-Stable. Is it possible to roll back the ports via CVSUP to 5.3 by just changing the TAG=. Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 09:12:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4450A16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:12:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A16D43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:12:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6O9C3RV016168 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:12:03 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050724015828.0ecca950@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:08:11 -0700 To: Robert Slade , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <1122195075.1041.2.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> References: <1122195075.1041.2.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: Reverting Ports 5.4 -> 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:12:11 -0000 At 01:51 AM 7/24/2005, Robert Slade wrote: >Hi, > >As I have been having problems with 5.4 on my Compaq Pl5000, I would >like to go back to 5.3-Stable. Is it possible to roll back the ports via >CVSUP to 5.3 by just changing the TAG=. There's no tags in ports like there are in src. You have to specify a date. Take a look at the "checkout mode" section in the cvsup man page for more details. -Glenn >Rob > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 09:54:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D614316A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:54:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markus@trippelsdorf.de) Received: from falcon.loomes.de (smtp.loomes.de [212.40.161.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8742343D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:54:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markus@trippelsdorf.de) Received: from port-212-202-35-78.dynamic.qsc.de ([212.202.35.78] helo=bsd.trippelsdorf.de) by falcon.loomes.de with asmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DwdBJ-0005ge-94 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:54:01 +0200 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:53:59 +0200 From: Markus Trippelsdorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050724095359.GA684@bsd.trippelsdorf.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Fan control software X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:54:03 -0000 Is there any software available, that can control the fans of my system, like the lm-sensors package for Linux? I can read out the fan speeds and temperatures of my motherboard with consolehm, but what I actually would like to do is to vary the fan speeds depending on the measured temperatures. -- Markus From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 10:10:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D13A16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:10:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jackqqpro@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4C343D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:10:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jackqqpro@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so248650rne for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:10:36 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=l1pfvjVce1zlMbRwb48o5wPZYFFFuTuPyBHHCPnL/jZa7kDwzzHMn3GktwYt0/xv4Ut+hiQWEPb2ohiscUB55Ooa4fmF5AU6Xdh9S71LU6PL7cFjPThWDoSrLEWlHqlCFw5v5lrR+LKmgV23Sa0HhUyoDfIVcq0rDLYiQdGeGtA= Received: by 10.38.97.71 with SMTP id u71mr1009409rnb; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.104.31 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <890a507f0507240310cfd8c38@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:10:36 +0800 From: jackqq To: "Gary W. Swearingen" In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <890a507f050723004844ce572b@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Holtek HT80232 NIC unrecognized on FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jackqq List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:10:37 -0000 Thank you! I tried setting flags and/or removing hints for ed(4) but it didn't work. I get the idea from /boot/device.hints that, perhaps not quite accurately, hints work more with ISA. But my NIC actually belongs to the PCI family. The last thing I tried before going mad saved me. :) I took a peek into the source of the NIC drivers. In /usr/src/sys/dev/ed/, there was a file named 'if_ed_pci.c', where I found a table to edit. The table was just located in the middle of the file. It read static struct _pcsid { uint32_t type; const char *desc; } pci_ids[] =3D { { 0x802910ec, "NE2000 PCI Ethernet (RealTek 8029)" }, { 0x50004a14, "NE2000 PCI Ethernet (NetVin 5000)" }, { 0x09401050, "NE2000 PCI Ethernet (ProLAN)" }, { 0x140111f6, "NE2000 PCI Ethernet (Compex)" }, { 0x30008e2e, "NE2000 PCI Ethernet (KTI)" }, { 0x19808c4a, "NE2000 PCI Ethernet (Winbond W89C940)" }, { 0x0e3410bd, "NE2000 PCI Ethernet (Surecom NE-34)" }, { 0x09261106, "NE2000 PCI Ethernet (VIA VT86C926)" }, { 0x00000000, NULL } }; With every product name preceded by its product ID and vendor ID, it was self-explanatory enough. So I inserted a line for my card, which read { 0x005812c3, "NE2000 PCI Ethernet (Holtek HT80232)" }, Finally, I rebuilt the kernel with a dynamic loaded ed(4) driver (if_ed.ko), which SUCCESSFULLY recognized my NIC. Hooray! Though without trial, I believe a kernel statically including the modified ed(4) would also work. However, I still wonder if there is some other way by which I don't have to edit the source. On 7/24/05, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: > jackqq writes: >=20 > > My ethernet adapter's chip is Holtek's HT80232. It seems to be not > > recognized by the GENERIC kernel or any if_*.ko module. >=20 > The ed(4) manpage has a "diagnostics" section and also mentions the > setting of "flags" (one of the hints) that "may be needed for some > clones". I might also try removing the "ed" hints altogether. >=20 > You DO have "device miibus" in the KERNCONF file, I hope. >=20 --=20 jackqq :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 10:16:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B78216A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:16:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from mail.efacilitas.de (efacilitas.de [213.133.110.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC7643D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:16:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by mail.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED71112397B; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:20:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FC712B096; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:15:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77065-04; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:15:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AAF112B02A; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:15:37 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E36A48.8020608@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:15:36 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glenn Dawson References: <6.1.0.6.2.20050724003611.19c20a20@cobalt.antimatter.net> In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20050724003611.19c20a20@cobalt.antimatter.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Cc: Paul Taylor , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCP3 Server on FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:16:01 -0000 Glenn Dawson wrote: > [...] rm -R /var/db/ports/isc-dhcp3-server to get rid of the old config. [...] "make rmconfig" is more gently ;-) Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 10:26:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442F816A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:26:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from mail.efacilitas.de (efacilitas.de [213.133.110.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C077B43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:26:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by mail.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12851239C5; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:31:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE8212B096; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:26:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77065-07; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:26:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD8512B02A; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:26:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E36CC6.7050504@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:26:14 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Slade References: <1122195075.1041.2.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1122195075.1041.2.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Reverting Ports 5.4 -> 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:26:39 -0000 Robert Slade wrote: > As I have been having problems with 5.4 on my Compaq Pl5000, I would > like to go back to 5.3-Stable. Is it possible to roll back the ports via > CVSUP to 5.3 by just changing the TAG=. There are not much reasons to use an old version of the ports. Do you have a specific problem? By the way, most likely you mean that you want to go back to 5.3-RELEASE. The operating system whose "uname -r" shows "5.3-STABLE" is one of thousands states between November 2004 and May 2005. Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 10:58:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED4A16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:58:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6CD43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:58:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 2933 invoked by uid 510); 24 Jul 2005 11:01:00 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.86.1/957. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-1.9/5.0):. Processed in 1.587953 secs); 24 Jul 2005 11:01:00 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-1.9/5.0):. Processed in 1.587953 secs Process 2916) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 11:00:58 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= In-Reply-To: <42E36CC6.7050504@cs.tu-berlin.de> References: <1122195075.1041.2.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> <42E36CC6.7050504@cs.tu-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <1122202858.1041.19.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:00:58 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Reverting Ports 5.4 -> 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:58:49 -0000 On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 10:26, Björn König wrote: > Robert Slade wrote: > > > As I have been having problems with 5.4 on my Compaq Pl5000, I would > > like to go back to 5.3-Stable. Is it possible to roll back the ports via > > CVSUP to 5.3 by just changing the TAG=. > > There are not much reasons to use an old version of the ports. Do you > have a specific problem? > > By the way, most likely you mean that you want to go back to > 5.3-RELEASE. The operating system whose "uname -r" shows "5.3-STABLE" is > one of thousands states between November 2004 and May 2005. > > Björn Thank you for the reply. My problem is that the machine worked fine with 5.3. The Machine is Qad processor 1 Gb ram with hardware raid with 5 drives set as 2 Raid arrays and 1 spare. I did a CVSup to RELENG_5. I rebuilt world and the kernel. Here the problems started. On booting it could not find any hard drives. It tried to boot the correct drive, but failed. At the mountroot prompt the ? option only lists the CD and FD. As far as I can tell it is a problem with GEOM trying to take over the raid. I can boot using kernel.old. >From the 5.4 release notes GEOM is mandatory for 5.4. As I do not have the expertise to fix this and I would rather have a working system, I would like to role back to 5.3 as this worked. I assume that if I did a CVSup with TAG=5.3 this should get me back to 5.3_stable. I am not convinced though. Is this correct? Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 11:10:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1309516A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:10:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gouders@et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de) Received: from alice.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de (alice.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de [193.175.197.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC2943D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:10:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gouders@et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de) Received: from musashi.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de (musashi.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de [193.175.197.95]) by alice.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j6OBA3eD019601 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:10:04 +0200 Received: from karga.hank.home ([10.8.0.6]) by musashi.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OBA2nc081022 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:10:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hank@karga.hank.home) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by karga.hank.home (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OBCdVx095354 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:12:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hank@karga.hank.home) Message-Id: <200507241112.j6OBCdVx095354@karga.hank.home> To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message from Chuck Swiger of "Fri, 22 Jul 2005 04:52:56 EDT." <42E0B3E8.8030000@mac.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:12:39 +0200 From: Dirk GOUDERS X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Cc: Subject: Re: ipfw and tun0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:10:14 -0000 > >>> I just started to use an ADSL line with PPPoE and want run a firewall > >>> between it and my local network. What I am wondering about is that even > >>> if I only have the default everything-blocking rule (deny ip from any to > >>> any) I still see incoming packets on tun0 with tcpdump. > > If you are using PPPoE, the system de-encapsulates the IP traffic off of the > PPP session via the tun0 interface. tun0 can be treated as your "external > interface" when writing firewall rules, setting up NAT, etc. Well, I am a little bit confused, because usually, I run machines with "real" NICs and if I activate firewall rules that drop packets from that NIC, I can run tcpdump on that NIC and will not see the dropped packets. This is the naive view, I have about this: NIC device (e.g. xl0) ----------------------------------------------------- packets -> packets -> ... packets -> packets -> ----------------------------------------------------- ^ ^ | | Here, ipfw checks Here, tcpdump listens the packets against and doesn't see dropped its rules and probably packets drops packets In the case of tun0, this order seems to be reverse... > Right. This implies that the firewall rules are working. If you > want to see what the situation looks like to a client machine > behind the firewall, either tcpdump on a client machine, or tcpdump > on the internal interface of the firewall box... Does that mean, that there is no way, to inspect the network traffic from tun0 after it has been "cleaned up" by ipfw and that is not forwarded to the internal NIC? Dirk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 11:57:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B573A16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:57:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au) Received: from smtp.ade.swiftdsl.com.au (smtp.ade.swiftdsl.com.au [218.214.228.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E04BC43D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:57:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au) Received: (qmail 9988 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2005 11:57:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO daemon.foo.lan) (218.214.176.70) by smtp.ade.swiftdsl.com.au with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 11:57:11 -0000 From: Ian Moore To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:26:55 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200507241015.45698.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> <42E2E9EF.9060707@cs.tu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <42E2E9EF.9060707@cs.tu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2539823.SOZd5ErPue"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200507242127.06381.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> Cc: "Anthony M. Agelastos" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: py24-numeric upgrade woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:57:10 -0000 --nextPart2539823.SOZd5ErPue Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 24 July 2005 10:37, Bj=F6rn K=F6nig wrote: > You can fix this temporarily if you add the line > > WRKSRC=3D ${WRKDIR}/Numeric-${PORTVERSION} > > to Makefile, e.g. just before > > .include > > in line 28. I sent a mail to the maintainer yesterday. > > Bj=F6rn Thanks, that allows it to build now, but it falls over during the install: =2D-> Installing the new version via the port =3D=3D=3D> Installing for py24-numeric-23.8 MA Version 12.2.0 Numeric Version 23.8 install -o root -g wheel -m=20 444 /usr/ports/math/py-numeric/work/Numeric-23.8/Demo/*.py /usr/local/share= /examples/py-numeric install -o root -g wheel -m=20 444 /usr/ports/math/py-numeric/work/Numeric-23.8/Demo/NumTut/* /usr/local/s= hare/examples/py-numeric/NumTut install -o root -g wheel -m=20 444 /usr/ports/math/py-numeric/work/numpy.pdf /usr/local/share/doc/py-numer= ic install: /usr/ports/math/py-numeric/work/numpy.pdf: No such file or directo= ry *** Error code 71 Stop in /usr/ports/math/py-numeric. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/math/py-numeric. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade2187.0= =20 make reinstall egrep: /var/db/pkg/py24-numeric-23.7/+CONTENTS: No such file or directory =2D--> Restoring the old version ** Fix the installation problem and try again. numpy.pdf is actually in /usr/ports/math/py-numeric/work/Numeric-23.8 By editing line 48 of the Makefile to: ${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKDIR}/Numeric-23.8/numpy.pdf ${DOCSDIR} the port installs correctly. Cheers, =2D-=20 Ian gpg key: http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~imoore/no-spam.asc --nextPart2539823.SOZd5ErPue Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC44ISPUlnmbKkJ6ARAgL8AJ95XGxMzriVMF08zVxSGmP6Wg/Z/QCfX4Y2 +eMejoq83lw9aUTeADNxyzg= =7OFm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2539823.SOZd5ErPue-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 09:15:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C56C16A41F; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:15:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: from coe.ufrj.br (roma.coe.ufrj.br [146.164.53.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA47643D45; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:15:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by coe.ufrj.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCA317008; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 06:15:44 -0300 (BRT) Received: from coe.ufrj.br ([146.164.53.65]) by localhost (roma.coe.ufrj.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 84119-03; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 06:15:41 -0300 (BRT) Received: from [200.217.89.237] (unknown [200.217.89.237]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by coe.ufrj.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C71417003; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 06:15:40 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <42E35C1F.1030004@jonny.eng.br> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 06:15:11 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= References: <42DE8877.6050808@jonny.eng.br> <8xoe8x9qtu.e8x@mail.opusnet.com> <42DFAF63.5080708@jonny.eng.br> <42E30DFF.4050000@jonny.eng.br> In-Reply-To: <42E30DFF.4050000@jonny.eng.br> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAADBQ TFRFAAAAgAAAAIAAgIAAAACAgACAAICAgICAwMDA/wAAAP8A//8AAAD//wD/AP//////ex+xxAAA Ac9JREFUOMtdk8FupDAMhr1qRbjR2x77GD3uq7BS1TkuhyrmFnppcvOrUlUquXltJ2EAIw1Dvvz+ bRPgrQbU6NpzuY0AF1LABIc4AH9crxLwb/4VztEU42W9SOBezwX4ClzeLuC9PBFRq+2xpJJHN8KQ Oa9Hd/ACnldgUVADvgHKA2usVwW12BVSkrThJH+5lqqQXIAAvRkQM6WqkADpO5gBx5m5VOxRgBZV HRLRcgc4dv3ukbOBm3de8uHIe1n0BBUBIi4hi0U2ownGkkwrwN425ygVPjntsvOmkFyyXYfreHXq f1tugFLCFDhZcsffYIqxKNAB/FkNbBDslUTz0MMQfuRnkN6D5nLVQ0G2H3bWC6KByTZPZWhJ/jgs ChX3e/P5y0VReCUCYm0/pUQd1lQ4/aIty/YtW6y3WMHc8yazpcU8UuqqB+LfMql/wVx4kXNTwGQO PxTuL7+AhbSkWS4z0TdZFbo1BR6qQkA08DnogNNHey/SGc5GejqFttxhjBHd3rjd62nR08gnxeFr Ic2e52we+QC0rIg6KYn1AKQsbF3wcgAP00MZrZ6X0yc5v5TRXgTi/jtVwef5I6Y+J7kyb+d1eB6K 4LoOLphBW/8PdNW9dapKWXwAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at coe.ufrj.br X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:57:55 +0000 Cc: questions@freebsd.org, "Gary W. Swearingen" , archie@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nForce3 SMB and Power Management X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:15:46 -0000 João Carlos Mendes Luís wrote: > > Gary W. Swearingen wrote: > >>João Carlos Mendes Luis writes: >> >> >> >>>gaia::root ~ [647] mbmon -I >>>No ISA-IO HWM available!! >>>InitMBInfo: Unknown error: 0 >>>gaia::root ~ [648] >> >> >>I don't get that with -I (just with -S). It pretends to work OK; just bad data, >>which might be related to the bogus temp. seen in BIOS setup screen. >> >> >> >>>none0@pci0:1:1: class=0x0c0500 card=0x813f1043 chip=0x00e410de rev=0xa1 hdr=0x00 >>> vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' >>> device = 'nForce PCI SMB Controller' >>> class = serial bus >>> subclass = SMBus >> >> >>I get: >> >>ichsmb0@pci0:1:1: class=0x0c0500 card=0x0c111458 chip=0x00e410de rev=0xa1 hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' >> device = 'nForce PCI System Management' >> class = serial bus >> subclass = SMBus > > > What's your FreeBSD version? At 5-stable, ichsmb attachs only to Intel devices, > that means that only chips numered 0x????8086 are accepted: > > /* PCI unique identifiers */ > #define ID_82801AA 0x24138086 > #define ID_82801AB 0x24238086 > #define ID_82801BA 0x24438086 > #define ID_82801CA 0x24838086 > #define ID_82801DC 0x24C38086 > #define ID_82801EB 0x24D38086 > #define ID_6300ESB 0x25a48086 > > I'll give it a try, anyway. Maybe compiling a kernel with ALL smb devices. Indeed, my kernel could find ichsmb. But mbmom still does not work. Are you sure you have no other smb device in your board? pciconf: ichsmb0@pci0:1:1: class=0x0c0500 card=0x813f1043 chip=0x00e410de rev=0xa1 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' device = 'nForce PCI SMB Controller' class = serial bus subclass = SMBus dmesg: gaia::root ichsmb [518] grep -i smb /var/run/dmesg.boot netsmb_dev: loaded ichsmb0: port 0x5040-0x507f,0x5000-0x503f,0x5080-0x509f at device 1.1 on pci0 gaia::root ichsmb [519] Note that the kernel found ichsmb, but found no smbus. Looking a bit deeper into the sources, ichsmb does attach to *ANY* PCI device which identifies itself as a class "serial bus" and subclass "SMBus". It is a mistake, and probably a bug. Maybe a leftover from debugging phase. I am CCing: the ichsmb author to remember him. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 12:51:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3FC16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:51:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-07.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 013E543D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:51:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: (qmail 22253 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2005 12:51:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warren.shinji.nq.nu) (203.217.13.157) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 12:51:26 -0000 From: Warren To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:52:40 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507242252.41445.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Subject: K3B & CD Burner X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:51:28 -0000 I am using FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE I just installed K3B and when i goto configure it, it dosent detect my CD Burner, even though i enter in the location /dev/acd1 .. what am i missing that it wont accept or detect my CD Burner ? -- Yours Sincerely Shinjii http://www.shinji.nq.nu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 12:52:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E528A16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:52:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (prime.gushi.org [65.125.228.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A51943D4C for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:52:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (danm@localhost.gushi.org [127.0.0.1]) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6OCqKZj013254 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:52:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from danm@localhost) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6OCqKMa013252; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:52:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:52:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050724081711.I7429@prime.gushi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Questions on termcap suggestions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:52:07 -0000 Hey all, Apologies. Long. Late. (Early). I just spent a few hours longer than I feel I should have had to learning about ANSI escape sequences and the raw unadulterated line-noise-like readability of the system termcap file. Here's the basics: I use pine's "print" command, which works fine, under a normal login (term type is vt100). Then I started with screen, which ignores the escape sequences pine sends and does not pass them on to the remote terminal. After a little research, I found the escape sequences for printer enableing and disabling, and I added the following to the termcap entry for "vt100" and rebuilt the thing: po=\E[5i:pf=\E[4i: And once I restarted screen, it worked. I'm sending this through so someone may find it in the future and save themself some effort. Now, I'm pretty sure those termcap entries are standard things, so I dunno if I can just throw in a send-pr to have them added (if I should, let me know, and I will). Otherwise, is there a sensible way to suggest this be added somewhere else? I mean, I don't want to set the assumption that ANY terminal setting itself as vt100 is in fact print-capable. (but then, pine without screen will do the same damage anyway). I'd say half the problem is in pine, honestly, which never *should* have worked without those entries present, but pine apparently doesn't check, instead just sending those sequences on its own. Related: In searching around I've also found a teeny tiny little program called lpansi that allows you to cat a file to your local printer. Shouldn't something like this be in the base, or in ports? I found things like birthstone references and what certain flowers mean in /usr/share/misc, why not a useful "print" command? -Dan -- "You're a thucking reyer!" -Richard Bozzello, who believed tongue piercing was painless. --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org --------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 12:57:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6677D16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:57:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptaylor@addressplus.net) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E191143D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:57:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptaylor@addressplus.net) Received: from addressplus.net (c-24-129-120-74.hsd1.fl.comcast.net[24.129.120.74]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2005072412570301500a2n8pe>; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:57:04 +0000 Received: from [192.168.111.99] ([192.168.111.99]) by addressplus.net ([127.0.0.1]) with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v6.5.2.R) for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:56:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20050724003611.19c20a20@cobalt.antimatter.net> References: <6.1.0.6.2.20050724003611.19c20a20@cobalt.antimatter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Paul Taylor Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:54:59 -0400 To: Glenn Dawson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.111.99 X-Return-Path: ptaylor@addressplus.net X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCP3 Server on FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:57:05 -0000 Glenn, Thanks for the suggestions, but I'm still coming up with the same failure... You said that it built for you - Are you on FreeBSD 4.11, or a newer build of FreeBSD? I ask because the maintainer of this port stated in this post (http:// lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-April/084442.html) that he didn't have a FreeBSD 4.11 box to test on and that that particular user's problem was related specifically to 4.11. I'm actually doing this to try to create a monowall development box, which uses 4.11 as a base system. My FreeBSD box is actually a VM. We need to be able to create our own special builds of monowall to add at least one new feature. The way things usually work is that one real reason starts us tinkering, then many additional features are suddenly "needed" once management realizes that we can add them... :) Paul On Jul 24, 2005, at 3:42 AM, Glenn Dawson wrote: > At 08:51 PM 7/23/2005, Paul Taylor wrote: > > >> Hi, >> >> I'm new to FreeBSD, so there is a good possibility that this is just >> something stupid that I'm doing wrong... I've had bad timing with >> linux software that I've tried installing in the past (just happened >> to try to install while there was a broken distribution, etc.) and >> I'm starting to think that is my situation here... >> >> I'm trying to install the ports version of isc-dhcp3-server... >> According to what I've read, it should be as simple as: >> >> cd /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server >> make >> (Set options in the dialog box, in my case unselect everything, then >> let it run the config, make, etc.) >> install -s work/dhcp-*/work.freebsd/server/dhcpd /usr/local/sbin >> >> Now, my problem starts with the make... When I run it, this is what >> I get: >> >> # make >> ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found >> ===> Found saved configuration for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 >> => dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. >> => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/. >> fetch: ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz: File unavailable >> (e.g., file not found, no access) >> => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/dhcp-3.0- >> history/. >> dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz 100% of 833 kB 408 >> kBps >> ===> Extracting for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 >> => Checksum OK for dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz. >> ===> Patching for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 >> ===> Configuring for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 >> Unexpected argument: server >> System Type: --subsys >> No build directory for freebsd - please run ./configure. >> ===> Building for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 >> make: don't know how to make all.server. Stop >> *** Error code 2 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server. >> >> So, it looks like it works correctly up until the Configure >> section... >> >> This output: >> >> Unexpected argument: server >> System Type: --subsys >> No build directory for freebsd - please run ./configure. >> >> is from the Configure script, in the /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3- >> server/ work/dhcp-3.0.2 directory... It doesn't appear to be >> expecting the >> "--subsys server" that is passed. >> >> Now, I ran a "make -n" to get the actual commands that it is issuing, >> and it does appear to be running "./configure --subsys server" and I >> also noticed that the last make it runs is: "make -f Makefile >> all.server". That probably explains the "make: don't know how to >> make all.server. Stop" error... >> >> Now, the real question is how to I fix this? Am I missing some sort >> of environment variable? Is this port broken? >> >> Also, note that I have tried manually running ./configure and >> performing a "make all"... But I get this far in the make, then: >> >> make: don't know how to make omshell.c. Stop >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server/work/dhcp-3.0.2/work.freebsd. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server/work/dhcp-3.0.2. >> >> So, I'm hoping someone out there can assist me... >> > > I just built the same port with the same options, and it built > without error, so I don't think the port is broken. > > I did notice this line in your output: > > Found saved configuration for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 > > which would indicate that it is using options from a previous > install. You might want to do a make clean in the ports dir, then > rm -R /var/db/ports/isc-dhcp3-server to get rid of the old config. > Then try a make install and see if builds correctly. > > -Glenn > > >> Thanks, >> Paul >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 13:28:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B449F16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:28:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nb_root@videotron.ca) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7024443D49 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:28:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nb_root@videotron.ca) Received: from clk01a ([66.130.198.54]) by VL-MO-MR007.ip.videotron.ca (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IK4002OMW2X7G@VL-MO-MR007.ip.videotron.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:28:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:28:09 -0400 From: Nicolas Blais In-reply-to: <200507242252.41445.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200507240928.09202.nb_root@videotron.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200507242252.41445.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Subject: Re: K3B & CD Burner X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:28:10 -0000 On July 24, 2005 08:52 am, Warren wrote: > I am using FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE > > I just installed K3B and when i goto configure it, it dosent detect my CD > Burner, even though i enter in the location /dev/acd1 .. what am i missing > that it wont accept or detect my CD Burner ? Run K3B as root. -- FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #4: Sat Jul 16 11:11:37 EDT 2005 root@clk01a:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CLK01A PGP? : http://66.130.198.54:8081/security/nb_root.asc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 13:30:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6AD16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:30:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: from excite.com (nn7.excitenetwork.com [207.159.120.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9032043D49 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:30:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: by xprdmailfe25.nwk.excite.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 343CABE107; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:30:55 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from [84.73.114.198] by xprdmailfe26.nwk.excite.com via HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:30:55 EST X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: ID = 2383e4973664c80f7198bf469d15c13b From: "PK" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: piotrekk@excite.com X-Mailer: PHP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050724133055.343CABE107@xprdmailfe25.nwk.excite.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:30:55 -0400 (EDT) Subject: howto export kde from freeBSD 5.4 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: piotrekk@excite.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:30:57 -0000 hi howto allow kde export from freeBSD 5.4 ? I mean to load KDE, for example with X-Win32 http://www.xwin32.com/en/products/ on the windows machine ? kind regards piotr _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 13:39:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF8916A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:39:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776BA43D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:39:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 4274 invoked by uid 510); 24 Jul 2005 13:41:19 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.86.1/957. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-1.7/5.0):. Processed in 1.835242 secs); 24 Jul 2005 13:41:19 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-1.7/5.0):. Processed in 1.835242 secs Process 4267) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 13:41:17 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <20050724133055.343CABE107@xprdmailfe25.nwk.excite.com> References: <20050724133055.343CABE107@xprdmailfe25.nwk.excite.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1122212476.1041.23.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:41:16 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: howto export kde from freeBSD 5.4 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:39:08 -0000 On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 13:30, PK wrote: > hi > > howto allow kde export from freeBSD 5.4 ? > > I mean to load KDE, for example with X-Win32 > > http://www.xwin32.com/en/products/ > > on the windows machine ? > > kind regards > piotr > > You are probably better off with VNC. Freebsd has a VNC Server in the ports and there are several free vnc clients for windows. Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 14:00:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F5816A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:00:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: from excite.com (nn7.excitenetwork.com [207.159.120.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C23043D5C for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:00:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: by xprdmailfe25.nwk.excite.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 086CBBE107; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:00:40 -0400 (EDT) To: bsd@bathnetworks.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from [84.73.114.198] by xprdmailfe26.nwk.excite.com via HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:00:40 EST X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: ID = 2383e4973664c80f7198bf469d15c13b From: "PK" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: piotrekk@excite.com X-Mailer: PHP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050724140040.086CBBE107@xprdmailfe25.nwk.excite.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:00:40 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Subject: Re: howto export kde from freeBSD 5.4 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: piotrekk@excite.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:00:42 -0000 yes, I know VNC but VNC create all the time a new KDE session and I'd like to export already running KDE session. --- On Sun 07/24, Robert Slade < bsd@bathnetworks.com > wrote: From: Robert Slade [mailto: bsd@bathnetworks.com] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:41:16 +0000 Subject: Re: howto export kde from freeBSD 5.4 ? On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 13:30, PK wrote:
> hi
>
> howto allow kde export from freeBSD 5.4 ?
>
> I mean to load KDE, for example with X-Win32
>
> http://www.xwin32.com/en/products/
>
> on the windows machine ?
>
> kind regards
> piotr
>
>

You are probably better off with VNC. Freebsd has a VNC Server in the
ports and there are several free vnc clients for windows.

Rob

_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 14:02:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2BD16A420 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:02:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from mail.efacilitas.de (efacilitas.de [213.133.110.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C926943D58 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:02:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by mail.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D4A123964; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:06:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7A112B1C4; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:01:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 78596-04; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:01:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2191712B02A; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:01:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E39F43.3050307@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:01:39 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Moore References: <200507241015.45698.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> <42E2E9EF.9060707@cs.tu-berlin.de> <200507242127.06381.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200507242127.06381.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Cc: "Anthony M. Agelastos" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: py24-numeric upgrade woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:02:07 -0000 Ian Moore wrote: > numpy.pdf is actually in /usr/ports/math/py-numeric/work/Numeric-23.8 > By editing line 48 of the Makefile to: > ${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKDIR}/Numeric-23.8/numpy.pdf ${DOCSDIR} > the port installs correctly. Ok, thanks. I didn't noticed it because I have NOPORTDOCS=yes in my make.conf. Regards Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 14:03:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C94A16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:03:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from stelesys.com (web1.stelesys.com [63.175.100.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B27A43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:03:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=www.stelesys.com) by stelesys.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1Dwh4X-000CC2-S5; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:03:17 -0400 Received: from 24.99.220.144 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jbell@stelesys.com); by www.stelesys.com with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:03:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1826.24.99.220.144.1122213797.squirrel@24.99.220.144> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:03:17 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jerry Bell" To: "Lei Sun" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: turck-mmcache-2.4.6 disappeared from ports tree? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:03:19 -0000 Turk has been replaced with eaccelerator, which is in the ports tree now. Jerry http://www.syslog.org > Hi, > > I am wondering why turck-mmcache-2.4.6 disappeared from the ports tree > in 5.4, and later on I found out that it disppeared in 5.3 as well. > > Will it make its way back to the ports tree? > > Any Ideas? > > Thanks in advance. > > Lei > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 14:20:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53A416A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:20:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leblanc@keyslapper.net) Received: from english-breakfast.cloud9.net (english-breakfast.cloud9.net [168.100.1.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39DAC43D5E for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:20:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leblanc@keyslapper.net) Received: from english-breakfast.cloud9.net (localhost.cloud9.net [127.0.0.1]) by english-breakfast.cloud9.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 6869FB776 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:20:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from keyslapper.net (250-119.customer.cloud9.net [168.100.250.119]) by english-breakfast.cloud9.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D4DB638 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:20:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keyslapper.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD8411579 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:20:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from keyslapper.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (keyslapper.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39063-01 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:20:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by keyslapper.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C6E3D11454; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:20:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:20:49 -0400 From: Louis LeBlanc To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050724142049.GA50696@keyslapper.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200507231237.44829.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> <42E2DCAC.3060700@grokking.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42E2DCAC.3060700@grokking.org> X-PGP-Key: http://www.keyslapper.net/~leblanc/leblanc-at-keyslapper-net.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at keyslapper.net X-AntiVirus: Checked by Vexira Antivirus v1.5 Subject: Re: [OT Re: SPAM Problem] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:20:56 -0000 --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/23/05 05:11 PM, Greg Maruszeczka sat at the `puter and typed: > Aaron Siegel wrote: > > Hello > >=20 > > This message is off topic but I was not sure were else I can go to get = help=20 > > with my problem. For the past week I have been receiving messages from= =20 > > various mail servers which have bounced messages I have not sent but ha= ve my=20 > > email address as the originator of the bounced message. I believe there= are=20 > > some SPAMers using my email address on their SPAM. I would really like = to=20 > > avoid changing my domain name. Has anyone experienced this problem? Is= there=20 > > something I can do? =20 > >=20 >=20 > It's probably "blowback" resulting from the activities of worm-infected > windows hosts. Someone you correspond with got infected and the worm > subsequently propagated itself by picking your name from their address > book and inserting it into the from: header of the message carrying the > worm. Then, badly configured MTAs send "helpful" NDRs to the "sender" > informing them that they're messages couldn't be delivered >=20 > Pretty routine, really. Sorry I missed the OP, but this is something pretty much everyone sees at one time or another. I got to the point where I was receiving around 200/day before I started seeing myself in Joe-Jobs. Basically, they want a shot at getting through those servers that simply require a valid email address in the From: header. I find it ridiculous that these mail servers simply bounce it to that address rather than simply interpreting the headers and sending it back to abuse/postman/admin at the originating relay. This would certainly bring it to the attention of the very few people with the ability to stop the email coming. In the meantime, I'm afraid there's not much you can do unless you want to track that relay down yourself. Even if you find it, most times it's out of your reach (different country, etc). And if you do find it and it's coming from the next town over, it's not like the authories will want to convict anyone of identity theft - they still tend to go for the low hanging fruit, so best case scenario is you can get the ISP to shut them down until they find another provider. Maybe (big maybe) the ISP will sue them, but you don't get anything for your effort but the satisfaction that they got burned. I eventually shut down the domain I was getting so much spam at. I recently turned it back on after 6 months of downtime and immediately started getting over 40/day. Looks like some spammers never pare down the lists they sell. The only thing you can really do is install spam filters (like ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin) so you don't have to look at it. Just make sure your address isn't whitelisted. Lou --=20 Louis LeBlanc FreeBSD-at-keyslapper-DOT-net Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) Please send off-list email to: leblanc at keyslapper d.t net Key fingerprint =3D C5E7 4762 F071 CE3B ED51 4FB8 AF85 A2FE 80C8 D9A2 I do desire we may be better strangers. -- William Shakespeare, "As You Like It" --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC46PBr4Wi/oDI2aIRAgzsAJ40+kGLkRGmbZivIs7lhLXAHD2jwACdFxha OjABIzYydrlUyEnWwLrhMck= =GDT+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 14:32:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6969316A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:32:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leblanc@keyslapper.net) Received: from russian-caravan.cloud9.net (russian-caravan.cloud9.net [168.100.1.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A6C43D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:32:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leblanc@keyslapper.net) Received: from russian-caravan.cloud9.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by russian-caravan.cloud9.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 44F901587F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:32:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from keyslapper.net (250-119.customer.cloud9.net [168.100.250.119]) by russian-caravan.cloud9.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B4215488 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:32:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keyslapper.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0227211579 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:32:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from keyslapper.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (keyslapper.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39030-03 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:32:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by keyslapper.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B871C11452; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:32:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:32:52 -0400 From: Louis LeBlanc To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050724143252.GB50696@keyslapper.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050721070434.254A11D930@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> <200507231250.16501.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> <20050724051648.GA4119@Pandora.MHoerich.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gj572EiMnwbLXET9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050724051648.GA4119@Pandora.MHoerich.de> X-PGP-Key: http://www.keyslapper.net/~leblanc/leblanc-at-keyslapper-net.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at keyslapper.net X-AntiVirus: Checked by Vexira Antivirus v1.5 Subject: Re: undelete in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:32:57 -0000 --gj572EiMnwbLXET9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/24/05 07:16 AM, Mario Hoerich sat at the `puter and typed: > # Aaron Siegel: >=20 >=20 > [ there is no un-rm ] > > > > One option I have seen for creating your own restore is to create a scr= ipt=20 > > that will move files you want to delete to a temporary directory, a "Tr= ash=20 > > Bin". Then use your shells aliases to alias the script to the rm comman= d.=20 >=20 > Don't *ever* create aliases for rm(1). rm's sole purpose in > life is to destroy files. If you tame it, you'll eventually > adapt and rm with less caution. There are lots of people who > eventually got bitten by that when working on a machine other > than their own. =20 >=20 > A better way is to use a name like "[tT]rash" or "tt" (=3D[move] > to trash). That way, when working on a machine without your > script, you'll get a nice and friendly "command not found" > reminding you there's no safety catch. >=20 > I'm personally none too fond of this, though. Unixoid systems > have quite a lot of ways to destroy files. Trashes won't really > protect you from that. Instead, they just give you a false > feeling of security, which merely encourages sloppiness. =20 >=20 > My own solution is actually quite simple: > I treat dangerous commands the same way I'd carry a deadly and > pretty annoyed snake: with my thoughts on the task at hand. > I read the command *before* I hit enter. Not the one I=20 > *think* I've written, but the one I'm about to execute. > I also tend to tab-expand globs to see which files are > actually affected. >=20 > YMMV, though. I have to second this - every bit of it. Deleting files is not an area you want to get sloppy in. I've been bitten even knowing rm would get rid of these files for good. I once fatfingered a space between a '*' and '.txt' and lost a weeks worth of code work in one fell swoop. Trust me, it's a mistake you make once and kick yourself for indefinitely. Trust me, I tend to use rm very carefully now, re-reading the command each time I use it. And no, I don't believe I'm making the case for a "trash" function. I think that would increase the chances of sloppiness. After the incident mentioned above, I considered the trash function, and eventually came to the same conclusions Mario mentioned above. Lou --=20 Louis LeBlanc FreeBSD-at-keyslapper-DOT-net Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) Please send off-list email to: leblanc at keyslapper d.t net Key fingerprint =3D C5E7 4762 F071 CE3B ED51 4FB8 AF85 A2FE 80C8 D9A2 First study the enemy. Seek weakness. -- Romulan Commander, "Balance of Terror", stardate 1709.2 --gj572EiMnwbLXET9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC46aUr4Wi/oDI2aIRAnX2AJ9NotbvJtCaOfWhZuWv9uIh7wRmFwCfRchu cwjl1j1HmpJkO0fZOzfbsR8= =PgZh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gj572EiMnwbLXET9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 14:35:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D67116A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:35:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com) Received: from smtpq1.home.nl (smtpq1.home.nl [213.51.128.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90D843D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:35:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com) Received: from [213.51.128.134] (port=37933 helo=smtp3.home.nl) by smtpq1.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Dwha0-0006Qp-4a; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:35:48 +0200 Received: from cp464173-a.dbsch1.nb.home.nl ([84.27.215.228]:61662 helo=desktop.homenet) by smtp3.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DwhZw-0005zu-3Y; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:35:44 +0200 From: Danny Pansters To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Warren Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:33:50 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200507242252.41445.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> In-Reply-To: <200507242252.41445.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> X-Face: "0Qv=,p:+]LvuqrtS4U\z3k"qN=.1]@=?utf-8?q?=258=3F=3BPoab=23v=27F=7E=0A=09!Wm=5Fe-=24=7EL=5D=3B?=>[c*L^Qoladj)x@mH}Bqz"vLO?Zdl}[@V@=?utf-8?q?U=3Fx3=23lI=3A=0A=09=24DN=7E!Hr?=@K`-mNv"zXm MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507241633.51371.danny@ricin.com> X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean Cc: Subject: Re: K3B & CD Burner X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:35:50 -0000 On Sunday 24 July 2005 14:52, Warren wrote: > I am using FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE > > I just installed K3B and when i goto configure it, it dosent detect my CD > Burner, even though i enter in the location /dev/acd1 .. what am i missing > that it wont accept or detect my CD Burner ? Read /usr/ports/sysutils/k3b/pkg-message5 Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 14:41:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC0816A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:41:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169D043D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:41:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.247.55] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A8B551880094; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:41:57 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OEfsXX000987; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:41:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6OEfji6000986; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:41:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= References: <42DE8877.6050808@jonny.eng.br> <8xoe8x9qtu.e8x@mail.opusnet.com> <42DFAF63.5080708@jonny.eng.br> <42E30DFF.4050000@jonny.eng.br> <42E35C1F.1030004@jonny.eng.br> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:41:45 -0700 In-Reply-To: <42E35C1F.1030004@jonny.eng.br> =?iso-8859-1?q?=28Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs's?= message of "Sun, 24 Jul 2005 06:15:11 -0300") Message-ID: <3wll3w466u.l3w@mail.opusnet.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nForce3 SMB and Power Management X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:41:21 -0000 João Carlos Mendes Luís writes: > João Carlos Mendes Luís wrote: > > Indeed, my kernel could find ichsmb. But mbmom still does not work. Are you > sure you have no other smb device in your board? I don't see anything else in "scanpci" or "pciconf" or "/var/run/dmesg" which has this only related line ichsmb0: port 0x2000-0x203f,0x1c00-0x1c3f,0xe800-0xe81f irq 23 at device 1.1 on pci0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 14:47:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE6F16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:47:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50E443D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:47:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.247.55] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id AA1C51E80094; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:47:56 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OElomC001079; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:47:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6OEljH6001078; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:47:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: jackqq References: <890a507f050723004844ce572b@mail.gmail.com> <890a507f0507240310cfd8c38@mail.gmail.com> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:47:45 -0700 In-Reply-To: <890a507f0507240310cfd8c38@mail.gmail.com> (jackqq's message of "Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:10:36 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Holtek HT80232 NIC unrecognized on FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:47:17 -0000 jackqq writes: > Finally, I rebuilt the kernel with a dynamic loaded ed(4) driver > (if_ed.ko), which SUCCESSFULLY recognized my NIC. Good work. There ought to be a web page with little success stories like yours, to incourage more people to look at the source. I sure hope you'll file a PR about your addition to the file. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 14:54:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B275716A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:54:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from agniewszka@o2.pl) Received: from poczta.o2.pl (mx.go2.pl [193.17.41.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABBA43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:54:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from agniewszka@o2.pl) Received: from aga (bgp119.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.28.79.119]) by poczta.o2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE30137832 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:54:40 +0200 (CEST) References: Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Agnieszka Parchimowicz" Organization: www.tlen.pl Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:54:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera M2/7.54 (Win32, build 3865) Subject: Fwd: request X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:54:45 -0000 Good day! We are along with my family collectors of every gadgets of promotional different firms, institution and foundation, so, I is returned with question if capability exists from state -member of message some free promotional gadgets and reinforcement our collection? If here, our address: Agnieszka Parchimowicz Ul. Ossowskiego 9 86-300 GrudziÄ…dz POLAND We will be very grateful From greetings Parchimowicz -- Moim programem pocztowym jest Opera: http://www.opera.com/m2/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 15:03:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FDF16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:03:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4121143D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:03:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.247.55] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id ADEC5F090106; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:04:12 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OF48Hc001345; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:04:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6OF3xfD001342; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:03:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Robert Slade References: <1122195075.1041.2.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> <42E36CC6.7050504@cs.tu-berlin.de> <1122202858.1041.19.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:03:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1122202858.1041.19.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> (Robert Slade's message of "Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:00:58 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Reverting Ports 5.4 -> 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:03:35 -0000 Robert Slade writes: > As I do not have the expertise to fix this and I would rather have a > working system, I would like to role back to 5.3 as this worked. I > assume that if I did a CVSup with TAG=5.3 this should get me back to > 5.3_stable. I am not convinced though. Is this correct? AFAIK, the only 5 thing called "stable" is 5-STABLE = RELENG_5, which, of course, is not stable; for that reason, you might try getting and trying it again -- you might have grabbed it at a bad moment, like between updates. And I'm not aware of a "5.3" tag other than "RELENG_5_3" (the latest bug-fix release) and RELENG_5_3_0_RELEASE (the original release). As for the ports, I doubt that you need to do anything, but it sounds from /usr/ports/sysutils/portdowngrade/pkg-descr that there's a way to revert ports as needed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 15:29:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD16516A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:29:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6167443D49 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:29:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (wojtek@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6OFTFPh005442 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:29:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.12.11/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id j6OFTEFe009749 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:29:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:29:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: FreeBSD-current/amd64 the only os that works! ;) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:29:34 -0000 i've just got new system (MSI Nforce 250Gb-based with athlon64). tried NetBSD, tried FreeBSD-5.4, even tried Windows XP PRO X64 and none of them detects builtin network chip. not a lack of driver problem - chip isn't listed on PCI bus at all!!! this motherboard is listed on FreeBSD webpage as having broken BIOS (not the only of course) and that's since April 2005 -current runs on it. and indeed - everything is detected and everything works. but 1) what are these all ACPI errors? can them be just ignored or it is a problem? 2) why - with interrupt controller capable of 24 ints and lots of them unused - network card and one of USB controller gets same interrupt 21? 3) is that high system load normal under net traffic. ftp'ing with 100Mbit/s speed takes about 10% CPU. with such fast CPU is quite a big value. is't it an effect of using same interrupt line that USB? thank you for all help and congratulations for FreeBSD programmers that make it fully working on that hardware! i initially wanted to use NetBSD on it, but FreeBSD at least works :) and appears to work much better under high filesystem load - so i will change my preferences. and USB mass storage devices really hot plugs and unplugs :) Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT-SNAP005 #0: Sun Jul 24 16:52:47 CEST 2005 root@new.dom:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/local ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 2800+ (1808.81-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0xfc0 Stepping = 0 Features=0x78bfbff AMD Features=0xe0500800 real memory = 268369920 (255 MB) avail memory = 250380288 (238 MB) ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) pci_link0: irq 3 on acpi0 pci_link1: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link2: on acpi0 pci_link3: on acpi0 pci_link4: on acpi0 pci_link5: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link6: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link7: irq 5 on acpi0 pci_link8: on acpi0 pci_link9: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link10: on acpi0 pci_link11: irq 5 on acpi0 pci_link12: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link13: on acpi0 pci_link14: on acpi0 pci_link15: on acpi0 pci_link16: on acpi0 pci_link17: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link18: irq 16 on acpi0 pci_link19: irq 17 on acpi0 pci_link20: irq 18 on acpi0 pci_link21: irq 19 on acpi0 pci_link22: irq 16 on acpi0 pci_link23: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link24: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link25: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link26: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link27: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link28: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link29: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link30: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link31: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link32: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link33: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link34: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link35: irq 0 on acpi0 Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff,0xcf0-0xcf3 on acpi0 pci_link29: BIOS IRQ 5 for -2145927624.1.INTA is invalid pci_link23: BIOS IRQ 10 for -2145927624.2.INTA is invalid pci_link24: BIOS IRQ 10 for -2145927624.2.INTB is invalid pci_link30: BIOS IRQ 10 for -2145927624.2.INTC is invalid pci_link25: BIOS IRQ 5 for -2145927624.5.INTA is invalid pci_link27: BIOS IRQ 11 for -2145927624.6.INTA is invalid pci_link35: BIOS IRQ 11 for -2145927624.10.INTA is invalid pci0: on pcib0 pci_link29: Unable to choose an IRQ pci_link23: Unable to choose an IRQ pci_link24: Unable to choose an IRQ pci_link30: Unable to choose an IRQ pci_link25: Unable to choose an IRQ pci_link27: Unable to choose an IRQ pci_link35: Unable to choose an IRQ agp0: mem 0xe0000000-0xe7ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 isab0: at device 1.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: at device 1.1 (no driver attached) ohci0: mem 0xeb005000-0xeb005fff irq 21 at device 2.0 on pci0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered ohci1: mem 0xeb000000-0xeb000fff irq 22 at device 2.1 on pci0 ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: SMM does not respond, resetting usb1: on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xeb001000-0xeb0010ff irq 23 at device 2.2 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: EHCI version 1.0 usb2: companion controllers, 4 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2: on ehci0 usb2: USB revision 2.0 uhub2: nVidia EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered nve0: port 0xb800-0xb807 mem 0xeb002000-0xeb002fff irq 21 at device 5.0 on pci0 nve0: Ethernet address 00:11:09:d2:83:6b miibus0: on nve0 ukphy0: on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto nve0: Ethernet address: 00:11:09:d2:83:6b nve0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pcm0: port 0xbc00-0xbcff,0xc000-0xc07f mem 0xeb003000-0xeb003fff irq 22 at device 6.0 on pci0 pcm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pcm0: atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xf000-0xf00f at device 8.0 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 atapci1: port 0x9f0-0x9f7,0xbf0-0xbf3,0x970-0x977,0xb70-0xb73,0xdc00-0xdc0f,0xe000-0xe07f irq 23 at device 10.0 on pci0 ata2: on atapci1 ata3: on atapci1 pcib1: at device 11.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pcib2: at device 14.0 on pci0 pci_link18: BIOS IRQ 22 for 0.6.INTA is invalid pci_link19: BIOS IRQ 23 for 0.10.INTA is invalid pci2: on pcib2 pci2: at device 6.0 (no driver attached) fxp0: port 0xa400-0xa43f mem 0xea020000-0xea020fff,0xea000000-0xea01ffff irq 17 at device 10.0 on pci2 miibus1: on fxp0 inphy0: on miibus1 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fxp0: Ethernet address: 00:07:e9:0a:04:1a sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77b irq 7 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff,0xc8000-0xcbfff,0xcc000-0xcd7ff,0xce000-0xcf7ff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1808811452 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec IPv6 packet filtering initialized, default to accept, logging limited to 50 packets/entry ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert loadable, rule-based forwarding enabled, default to accept, logging unlimited ad0: 38165MB at ata0-master UDMA100 acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 33.000MB/s transfers cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 15:45:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC4E16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:45:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D331C43D49 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:45:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:45:07 +0200 id 0000004A.42E3B783.0000F517 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:45:07 +0200 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20050724154507.GA18016@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <6.1.0.6.2.20050724003611.19c20a20@cobalt.antimatter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: Dick Hoogendijk Subject: Re: DHCP3 Server on FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:45:12 -0000 On 24 Jul Paul Taylor wrote: > > Glenn, > > Thanks for the suggestions, but I'm still coming up with the same > failure... You said that it built for you - Are you on FreeBSD 4.11, > or a newer build of FreeBSD? I'm on FreeBSD-4.11-stable and the port builds very well. I have (of course) the latest cvsup ports colection and use portupgrade (of portinstall if you install a package for the first time). No build errors whatsoever. -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 15:47:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95F416A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:47:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E86F43D49 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:47:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.247.55] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A8141D3500A2; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:47:32 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OFmBAh001986; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:48:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6OFm5CE001985; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:48:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" References: <20050724081711.I7429@prime.gushi.org> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:48:05 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20050724081711.I7429@prime.gushi.org> (Dan Mahoney's message of "Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:52:20 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questions on termcap suggestions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:47:36 -0000 > I'm sending this through so someone may find it in the future and > save themself some effort. Good of you to try to document it; I wish I knew where else it could go. I wonder if there should be a wiki-type knowledge base for things like that. > Related: In searching around I've also found a teeny tiny little > program called lpansi that allows you to cat a file to your local > printer. Shouldn't something like this be in the base, or in ports? > I found things like birthstone references and what certain flowers > mean in /usr/share/misc, why not a useful "print" command? It's easy to guess why not: the developers who've paid their dues (or otherwise got their clout), and so control the contents of the base OS, haven't been convinced to put it in. You could write a PR proposing the addition, but you'd have better luck volunteering to make a port for it. As for "cruft" in the OS, a PR on the subject would be more likely to encourage some cleanup than any comments in -questions. Removing cruft can often be more work than adding it, so it tends to take plenty of encouragement, or volunteer work. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 15:49:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CFC16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:49:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from randomiadgf@fsck.ch) Received: from smtp.hispeed.ch (mxout.hispeed.ch [62.2.95.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2552643D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:49:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from randomiadgf@fsck.ch) Received: from angel-one.fsck.ch (84-73-157-166.dclient.hispeed.ch [84.73.157.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.hispeed.ch (8.12.6/8.12.6/tornado-1.0) with ESMTP id j6OFn3En013900 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:49:04 +0200 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:48:33 +0200 From: Tobias Roth To: questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050724174833.6777bfe2.randomiadgf@fsck.ch> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.0beta6 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.1/989/Fri Jul 22 23:27:30 2005 on smtp-03.tornado.cablecom.ch X-Virus-Status: Clean X-DCC-spamcheck-01.tornado.cablecom.ch-Metrics: smtp-03.tornado.cablecom.ch 32700; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Cc: Subject: How to remove bootloader from a slice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:49:05 -0000 Hi I am trying to remove a bootloader accidentally installed on ad0s3. I tried overwriting it with fdisk -B -b /boot/boot0 -3 but that didn't have any effect. And anyway, I'd rather see it gone than replaced with the FreeBSD bootloader. boot0cfg doesn't seem to be able to act on slices alone. That leaves dd, but as I am not sure how to do it correctly, I thought I'd rather ask first. thanks, t. -- Tobias Roth | Berne, Switzerland | http://fsck.ch From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 15:49:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD04F16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:49:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from felix-freebsd@fefe.de) Received: from codeblau.de (ipx10069.ipxserver.de [80.190.240.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DB343D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:49:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from felix-freebsd@fefe.de) Received: (qmail 20025 invoked by uid 1000); 24 Jul 2005 15:49:42 -0000 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:49:42 +0200 From: Felix von Leitner To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050724154942.GA19992@codeblau.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: how to boot into freebsd installer using pxe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:49:46 -0000 Hi! I would like to offer a network based install service in our LAN here, and I would like it to be able to install NetBSD, OpenBSD, FreeBSD and Gentoo. I have a PXE environment booting Grub 0.97, which can boot a Net/OpenBSD kernels and the FreeBSD loader. So far, so good. Which files do I need to offer over TFTP or NFS for PXE to boot into the installer? How do I pre-configure the installer to install from the install server per default, and not from the Internet? I'm not particularly glued to grub, if it is better to do this with syslinux (or $WHATEVER), I'm game. However, I need to have a boot menu offering all the above operating systems, I can not simply boot directly into NetBSD's PXE loader. And I want to offer a net-bootable memtest. By the way: OpenBSD ships the pxeboot file in their install directory, I would very much like FreeBSD to do the same. I would like FreeBSD to shop a tarball with the necessary files (minus the install sets) that need to be available via TFTP/NFS and a small README saying what needs to be done, in a system-agnostic way. I'm thinking about an install LAN on a LAN party here, so as many people as possible can install FreeBSD. The next step would be to offer something like a live CD just bootable over PXE. Think about the advocacy possibilities if people can just try FreeBSD over the net! Also, think about the environment, of all the CDs that don't need to be burned or pressed and then thrown away. Felix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 16:09:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527EE16A420 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:09:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D020043D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:09:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A615E23; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:09:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29176-02; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:08:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-54-113.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.54.113]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54D05C45; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:08:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42E3BD1D.4020301@mac.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:09:01 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dirk GOUDERS References: <200507241112.j6OBCdVx095354@karga.hank.home> In-Reply-To: <200507241112.j6OBCdVx095354@karga.hank.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw and tun0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:09:09 -0000 Dirk GOUDERS wrote: [ ... ] >> If you are using PPPoE, the system de-encapsulates the IP traffic off of the >> PPP session via the tun0 interface. tun0 can be treated as your "external >> interface" when writing firewall rules, setting up NAT, etc. > > Well, I am a little bit confused, because usually, I run machines with > "real" NICs and if I activate firewall rules that drop packets from > that NIC, I can run tcpdump on that NIC and will not see the dropped > packets. Are you 100% certain of that? What you've described does not match how tcpdump on a BSD system works here: nfw1# ipfw add 10 deny ip from any to any 321 00010 deny ip from any to any dst-port 321 nfw1# tcpdump -nt -i fxp0 port 321 tcpdump: listening on fxp0 68.161.54.113.2145 > 199.103.21.225.321: S 610825795:610825795(0) win 57344 (DF) 68.161.54.113.2145 > 199.103.21.225.321: S 610825795:610825795(0) win 57344 (DF) ^C 44 packets received by filter 0 packets dropped by kernel tcpdump sees the incoming SYN packets just fine, even if IPFW denies them in the very first rule. > This is the naive view, I have about this: > > NIC device (e.g. xl0) > > ----------------------------------------------------- > packets -> packets -> ... packets -> packets -> > ----------------------------------------------------- > ^ ^ > | | > Here, ipfw checks Here, tcpdump listens > the packets against and doesn't see dropped > its rules and probably packets > drops packets There's a diagram in the IPFW manpage that has a better description of the packet flow. tcpdump runs sooner than you've shown, and traffic through most interfaces is bidirectional. >> Right. This implies that the firewall rules are working. If you >> want to see what the situation looks like to a client machine >> behind the firewall, either tcpdump on a client machine, or tcpdump >> on the internal interface of the firewall box... > > Does that mean, that there is no way, to inspect the network > traffic from tun0 after it has been "cleaned up" by ipfw and that is > not forwarded to the internal NIC? You can either add a log rule after your IPFW reject rules, and have the firewall itself log the traffic which is permitted through, or you could use another divert rule and force that traffic into a daemon which looks at the packets (this is how natd works, after all). -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 16:13:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F82C16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:13:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marius@korsmo.org) Received: from elwolfie.com (elwolfie.com [195.204.13.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CA243D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:13:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marius@korsmo.org) Received: from localhost (elwolfie.com [127.0.0.1]) by elwolfie.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD64D5A for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:13:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elwolfie.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (elwolfie.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24090-09 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:13:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by elwolfie.com (Postfix, from userid 33) id 4404B5B; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:13:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mp-117-185.daxnet.no (mp-117-185.daxnet.no [193.216.117.185]) by elwolfie.com (Horde MIME library) with HTTP for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:13:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20050724181301.vl95fhi004gg8sg8@elwolfie.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:13:01 +0200 From: Marius Korsmo To: freeb