From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Nov 9 12: 2: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from bigphred.greycat.com (bigphred.greycat.com [207.173.133.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A07A14D9F for ; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 12:02:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dann@bigphred.greycat.com) Received: (from dann@localhost) by bigphred.greycat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA07438 for chat@freebsd.org; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 12:02:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dann) Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 12:02:13 -0800 From: Dann Lunsford To: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Quotation Message-ID: <19991109120213.A7365@greycat.com> References: <38285F15.A656E35B@cstone.net> <000a01bf2ae1$08b6a920$021d85d1@youwant.to> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <000a01bf2ae1$08b6a920$021d85d1@youwant.to> Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Nov 09, 1999 at 10:34:19AM -0800, David Schwartz wrote: > > system is distributed for free. Those that write enhancements to it are > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > required to make those available to everyone. This has resulted in a > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Sadly, he misses the whole point of BSD. The beauty of it is that you can > make enhancements to it without anyone pointing a gun to your head. Hmm. I think that Frankenburg would be unlikely to make such a mistake, given his history. Maybe the reporter dropped a "not" between the "are" and the "required". Wouldn't be the first time something like that happened... Anybody got Frankenburg's e-mail? Maybe we should ask him. Dann L. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message