Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 3 Oct 2016 20:32:03 +0100
From:      Bruce Simpson <bms@fastmail.net>
To:        Eric van Gyzen <vangyzen@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r306652 - head/usr.sbin/arp
Message-ID:  <d08c25b0-1171-3688-67e7-8d954f5f087b@fastmail.net>
In-Reply-To: <b1698eea-0ef0-7cc0-6fa7-e9eaca8b8d8d@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201610031902.u93J2MR8062236@repo.freebsd.org> <abe6604a-cc69-f104-1ce1-7aaa48f4f076@fastmail.net> <b1698eea-0ef0-7cc0-6fa7-e9eaca8b8d8d@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/10/16 20:22, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
> The collision is unfortunate, but I agree that the context should be enough.

Agreed -- other technical writers have also used this version of the 
GARP acronym in doco.

>> However, that GARP -- 802.1ak -- is due to be replaced with MRP.
>
> The "Mental-map Rewriting Protocol"?  ;-)

Multiple Registration Protocol (MRP) is intended to fill most of the 
roles GARP/GVRP did, for dynamic VLAN, end-station MAC and L2 multicast 
registration. (Think Ethernet multicast without IP.)

Actually, being reminded of this gave me an idea -- adding a subset of 
what's needed to support MRP to if_bridge would probably also help for 
supporting Ethernet rings; those protocols need to call into VLAN 
registration and port blocking too.

It would make for some good junior kernel hacker tasks...



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d08c25b0-1171-3688-67e7-8d954f5f087b>