Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 19:16:30 +0000 From: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> To: Jaakko Heinonen <jh@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/160979: 9.0 burncd error caused by change to cd0 from acd0 Message-ID: <20110925191630.GA54429@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201109251010.p8PAA8qn067210@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201109251010.p8PAA8qn067210@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun Sep 25 11, Jaakko Heinonen wrote: > The following reply was made to PR bin/160979; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Jaakko Heinonen <jh@FreeBSD.org> > To: Joe Barbish <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> > Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: bin/160979: 9.0 burncd error caused by change to cd0 from acd0 > Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 13:00:43 +0300 > > On 2011-09-24, Joe Barbish wrote: > > It seems that in 9.0 the cd/dvd/drive is now given a dev name of cd0 > > where in all previous releases it was acd0. > > Tried to use the system burncd command in 9.0 and got this error msg > > > > burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCGETBLOCKSIZE): Inappropriate ioctl for device > > > > Tested using "burncd -f acd0" and "burncd -f cd0". > > In both cases got the same error message. > > > > Looks to me like the burncd command needs to be fixed > > to work in 9.0. > > burncd(8) supports only acd(4) driver. In 9.0 the default is the new > CAM-based ATA stack which uses cd(4) (UPDATING entry 20110424). > > It's unlikely that a support for cd(4) will be added to burncd(8). hi jaakko, didn't you experiment with a modified burncd(8) version, which uses scsi as backend at some point? cheers. alex > > I think this should be mentioned in release notes. > > -- > Jaakko
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110925191630.GA54429>