Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:41:59 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: "Danny J. Mitzel" <mitzel@acm.org> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Tony Moseby <tsmoseby@yahoo.no> Subject: Re: vlan id 0 Message-ID: <CAJ-VmomVROAeOyemtW25RUcE4tNwXKSNrroE--P8shM2Zht9YA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGGpV=E8cS-2p3zv2BORbz3a_AmVVOvYoRbxOJDX=kSudADPrg@mail.gmail.com> References: <1411826158.72985.YahooMailNeo@web172803.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <CAJ-VmonfdE_NPo%2BydnE8xHb_j8ZURG-pCm3EZUEEP0u9T98f1g@mail.gmail.com> <CAGGpV=E8cS-2p3zv2BORbz3a_AmVVOvYoRbxOJDX=kSudADPrg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ok.. Can someone please submit a PR with a patch that addresses this? I'll try to make sure it gets into freebsd-head. -a On 27 September 2014 18:24, Danny J. Mitzel <mitzel@acm.org> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > .. the spec allows vlan id=0? > > 0 is not a valid VLAN ID but the specs do allow it > in a tagged packet, it's called "Priority tagged". > The priority bits should be interpreted when making > any queuing / scheduling decisions during forwarding. > The VLAN ID bits are ignored and packet is to be > treated as untagged during forwarding / flooding > decisions.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmomVROAeOyemtW25RUcE4tNwXKSNrroE--P8shM2Zht9YA>