From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 9 20:35:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498EE16A4CE for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 20:35:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from eep.lcs.mit.edu (eep.lcs.mit.edu [18.31.0.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70B543D2F for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 20:35:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dga@eep.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from eep.lcs.mit.edu (localhost.lcs.mit.edu [127.0.0.1]) by eep.lcs.mit.edu (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j19KZYGR041310 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:35:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from dga@eep.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from dga@localhost) by eep.lcs.mit.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j19KZYA4041309; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:35:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from dga) Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:35:34 -0500 From: "David G. Andersen" To: Andre Oppermann Message-ID: <20050209203534.GA41287@lcs.mit.edu> References: <20050209170802.GA39472@lcs.mit.edu> <420A4957.15E0D656@networx.ch> <20050209185828.GD39472@lcs.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050209185828.GD39472@lcs.mit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5 tests=BAYES_00 version=FluxMilter1.2 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: "David G. Andersen" Subject: Re: Kern/73129 and 5.3-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 20:35:39 -0000 On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 01:58:28PM -0500, David G. Andersen scribed: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 06:33:11PM +0100, Andre Oppermann scribed: > > > > > > (Barring that, has anyone patched it in their own system, and if so, > > > would you mind sending me the patch? I dislike running custom kernel > > > code on these machines, but I'm happy to do so to get things working. :) > > > > Sorry, it'll be fixed in 5.4-RELEASE. I have made up my mind how to > > fix it the most correct way. > > Should have CC:'d; sorry. > > Thanks much for the quick response, Andre. If there's a patch available, > or any workaround you can think of, I'd love to know. Also, if you > need a beta tester or a test machine, or if there's anything else I > can do, please don't hesitate to ask. I'm happy to hack on it if > needs be. To answer my own question - I removed the if local checks, and have a functioning kernel again, back to whatever bug Andre's patch was correcting. :) -Dave