From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jul 13 14:26:11 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA11944 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 14:26:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from resnet.uoregon.edu (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.144.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA11934 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 14:26:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.8.5/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA18273; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 14:26:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 14:26:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Mike Pelletier cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pppd -> Cisco In-Reply-To: <35AA5F14.5AE91E28@compar.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 13 Jul 1998, Mike Pelletier wrote: > I'd really prefer to talk to freebsd-answers, but I'll take what I > can get! We're working on freebsd-answers. But for now you get to put up with me directly. :) > I'm trying to establish an ISDN connection with a national > provider. They are using a Cisco 7513, I am using a Motorola Bitsurfr > Pro, which is just an ISDN "modem", and either of the two popular PPP > packages (pppd and user-ppp). The provider uses CHAP authentication. > However, I find myself totally unable to negotiate an authentication > method, never mind actually authenticate. Perhaps I'm reading the debug > info wrong: > > Jul 13 14:55:22 skippy pppd[6469]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x90 > ] Okay, here you've asked for PAP authentication ... > Jul 13 14:55:22 skippy pppd[6469]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x41 > ] > Jul 13 14:55:22 skippy pppd[6469]: sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x90 05>] .. and the Cisco says `no, I don't want CHAP'. But... > Jul 13 14:55:22 skippy pppd[6469]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x41 > ] the original information is okay, without PAP. > Jul 13 14:55:22 skippy pppd[6469]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x91 > ] > Jul 13 14:55:22 skippy pppd[6469]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x91 > ] You two appear to be happy now. > I've called many times saying it looks like they have PAP turned on, > or CHAP turned off, but they say they've checked it over and over, and > it's correct. If I accept PAP authentication, it seems to ignore my > authentication packets, and hangs up. Is there know problem dealing > with this router? Is there some deficiency in these PPP packages which > makes it somehow incompatible? Is the phone company screwing with my > head? Any help would be appreceated. Bad password? Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message