Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 15:47:36 +0000 (UTC) From: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> To: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org Subject: svn commit: r323930 - stable/11/usr.sbin/i2c Message-ID: <201709221547.v8MFlauh019384@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Author: ian Date: Fri Sep 22 15:47:35 2017 New Revision: 323930 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/323930 Log: MFC r323465: Make i2c -s (device scan) work on hardware that supports only full xfers. The existing scan code is based on sending an i2c START condition and if there is no error it assumes there is a device at that i2c address. Some i2c controllers don't support sending individual start/stop signals on the bus, they can only perform complete data transfers with start/stop handled in the silicon. This adds a fallback mechanism that attempts to read a single byte from each i2c address. It's less reliable than looking for an an ACK repsonse to a start, because some devices will NAK an attempt to read that isn't preceeded by a write of a register address. Writing to devices to probe them is too dangerous to even consider. The user is told that a less-reliable scan is being done, so even if the read-scan comes up empty too, it's still a vast improvement over the old situation where it would just claim there were no devices on the bus even though the devices were there and working fine. If the i2c controller responds with a proper ENODEV (device doesn't support operation) or an almost-proper EOPNOTSUPP, the START/STOP scan is switched to a read-scan right away. Most controllers respond with ENXIO or EIO if they don't support START/STOP, so no quick-out is available. For those, if a scan of all 127 addresses and come up empty, the scan is re-done using the read method. Reported by: Maxim Filimonov <che@bein.link> Modified: stable/11/usr.sbin/i2c/i2c.c Directory Properties: stable/11/ (props changed) Modified: stable/11/usr.sbin/i2c/i2c.c ============================================================================== --- stable/11/usr.sbin/i2c/i2c.c Fri Sep 22 15:40:56 2017 (r323929) +++ stable/11/usr.sbin/i2c/i2c.c Fri Sep 22 15:47:35 2017 (r323930) @@ -121,9 +121,12 @@ skip_get_tokens(char *skip_addr, int *sk_addr, int max static int scan_bus(struct iiccmd cmd, char *dev, int skip, char *skip_addr) { + struct iic_msg rdmsg; + struct iic_rdwr_data rdwrdata; struct skip_range addr_range = { 0, 0 }; int *tokens, fd, error, i, index, j; - int len = 0, do_skip = 0, no_range = 1; + int len = 0, do_skip = 0, no_range = 1, num_found = 0, use_read_xfer = 0; + uint8_t rdbyte; fd = open(dev, O_RDWR); if (fd == -1) { @@ -157,6 +160,14 @@ scan_bus(struct iiccmd cmd, char *dev, int skip, char } printf("Scanning I2C devices on %s: ", dev); + +start_over: + if (use_read_xfer) { + fprintf(stderr, + "Hardware may not support START/STOP scanning; " + "trying less-reliable read method.\n"); + } + for (i = 1; i < 127; i++) { if (skip && ( addr_range.start < addr_range.end)) { @@ -180,17 +191,46 @@ scan_bus(struct iiccmd cmd, char *dev, int skip, char cmd.last = 1; cmd.count = 0; error = ioctl(fd, I2CRSTCARD, &cmd); - if (error) + if (error) { + fprintf(stderr, "Controller reset failed\n"); goto out; - - cmd.slave = i << 1; - cmd.last = 1; - error = ioctl(fd, I2CSTART, &cmd); - if (!error) - printf("%x ", i); - cmd.slave = i << 1; - cmd.last = 1; - error = ioctl(fd, I2CSTOP, &cmd); + } + if (use_read_xfer) { + rdmsg.buf = &rdbyte; + rdmsg.len = 1; + rdmsg.flags = IIC_M_RD; + rdmsg.slave = i << 1; + rdwrdata.msgs = &rdmsg; + rdwrdata.nmsgs = 1; + error = ioctl(fd, I2CRDWR, &rdwrdata); + } else { + cmd.slave = i << 1; + cmd.last = 1; + error = ioctl(fd, I2CSTART, &cmd); + if (errno == ENODEV || errno == EOPNOTSUPP) { + /* If START not supported try reading. */ + use_read_xfer = 1; + goto start_over; + } + cmd.slave = i << 1; + cmd.last = 1; + ioctl(fd, I2CSTOP, &cmd); + } + if (error == 0) { + ++num_found; + printf("%02x ", i); + } + } + /* + * If we found nothing, maybe START is not supported and returns a + * generic error code such as EIO or ENXIO, so try again using reads. + */ + if (num_found == 0) { + if (!use_read_xfer) { + use_read_xfer = 1; + goto start_over; + } + printf("<none found>"); } printf("\n");
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201709221547.v8MFlauh019384>