Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:50:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Petr Salinger <Petr.Salinger@seznam.cz> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve LinuxThreads compatibility in rfork() Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1107111641340.7134@sci.felk.cvut.cz> In-Reply-To: <20110711142232.GU43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <CAOfDtXMe_pkBdAFpUdvzmfs38Re=nw_YBz4w0Va0naEcuak7iw@mail.gmail.com> <20110711123332.GS43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <alpine.LRH.2.02.1107111455230.7134@sci.felk.cvut.cz> <20110711133342.GT43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <alpine.LRH.2.02.1107111556000.7134@sci.felk.cvut.cz> <20110711142232.GU43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> RFLINUXPTH was used by the linuxthreads port, that was popular in the > time of FreeBSD 4.x and may be 5.x to run mysql. I will object against > this breakage. Do I understand correctly that API/ABI backward compatibility with previous FreeBSD releases w.r.t RFLINUXPTH is needed ? The 1st patch satisfies this. I agree that SIGCHLD part is not easily readable. Petr
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LRH.2.02.1107111641340.7134>