Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:58:57 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> Cc: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: human-readable swap partition sizes with pstat -sh Message-ID: <20050106225857.GB784@darkness.comp.waw.pl> In-Reply-To: <20050106195719.GB24896@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <20050106191201.GA30826@gothmog.gr> <20050106195719.GB24896@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--bc2iwAtkAaXP8cWF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 11:57:19AM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote: +> I'd argue that we might want to replace the int64_t in humanize_number +> with intmax_t since that wouldn't change the ABI (or API due to implicit +> casts), but would mean we wouldn't have to add a humanize_number128 +> later if some architecture grows 128-bit ints for some reason or +> another. I like intmax_t also much better than int64_t, but I took it from NetBSD and they got int64_t there. Anyway, I think we don't have to be 100% compatible here and I'll look what can be done. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --bc2iwAtkAaXP8cWF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3cKxForvXbEpPzQRAsgdAJ9Js3Foxl7nUCVmugYA2KRgsQ098ACgusdk lBh7RTUZ+vCJO9eINy5OAmM= =R8mD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bc2iwAtkAaXP8cWF--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050106225857.GB784>