From owner-cvs-all Fri Feb 13 18:39:34 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA08024 for cvs-all-outgoing; Fri, 13 Feb 1998 18:39:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA07943 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 1998 18:39:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA28185; Fri, 13 Feb 1998 21:38:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 21:38:56 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199802140238.VAA28185@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Eivind Eklund Cc: committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: devfs persistence In-Reply-To: <19980214024018.55619@follo.net> References: <3896.887413886@critter.freebsd.dk> <199802140018.QAA05385@dingo.cdrom.com> <19980214024018.55619@follo.net> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk < said: > cases. Now, _including this requirement_, wouldn't it still feel good > to actually get DEVFS integrated and usable as the default _now_? No. I see no particular need for DEVFS. While it certainly moves some problems around, it's a substantial break with the POLA. (I didn't always think so, but considering the vigor of this flame war, it's clear that we are not even close to consensus.) -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message