Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 12:29:32 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: Charles Green <green@arf.cs.sunyit.edu>, hackers@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dumb question about SCO compat Message-ID: <321E069C.31D2DE92@whistle.com> References: <199608231614.MAA05605@arf.cs.sunyit.edu> <199608231808.MAA07705@rocky.mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Williams wrote: > > > Quite awhile back I heard someone mention that at one point > > they had a large subset of SCO running under the SCO (ibcs2) compat on > > a FreeBSD system. I also believe that he was using the shared libs > > scarfed off of a SCO system. (Finally to the question!) How possible > > is that now if I were to order the SCO Free* OpenServer and used those > > libs? > > It may have been Terry, but I've had some significant SCO applications > running under emulation. I had to use SCO shlibs initially, but since > it required SCO licenses for every application it made no sense, so I there's a word here that is missing... built? bought? ordered? and if so who do we talk to to get copies of these? > versions of the commercial software used which didn't use SCO shlibs. > > > I'm curious as to how much that would help in attempting to run > > something like SCO's oracle, word perfect, etc. > > That's the same reason I'm ordering it. > > Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?321E069C.31D2DE92>