From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 18 02:00:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD60106566B; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:00:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ben@wanderview.com) Received: from mail.wanderview.com (mail.wanderview.com [66.92.166.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24518FC0A; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from xykon.in.wanderview.com (xykon.in.wanderview.com [10.76.10.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.wanderview.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAI1xxE2063927 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:59:59 GMT (envelope-from ben@wanderview.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ben Kelly In-Reply-To: <4B034899.9090408@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:59:59 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <200911172021.16848.gnemmi@gmail.com> <41D86F39-D98A-4195-8345-765E0F742FAE@wanderview.com> <19e9a5dc0911171614l42f4c90ci2abce9982727ef61@mail.gmail.com> <4B033E22.3060700@FreeBSD.org> <8727F2A4-B830-43EE-BB9B-A17798374C00@wanderview.com> <4B034899.9090408@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.76.20.1 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WITHOUT_MODULES, does it actually work? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:00:02 -0000 On Nov 17, 2009, at 8:06 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > Ben Kelly wrote: >> It seems there are some left over bits then. I have this in = /usr/src/sys/modules/Makefile: >>=20 >> .for reject in ${WITHOUT_MODULES} >> SUBDIR:=3D ${SUBDIR:N${reject}} >> .endfor >=20 > Well it seems my search was not exhaustive. >=20 > My recommendation then would be to file a src PR so that someone can > look into it. :) I've opened a doc PR for the bad example in the handbook and a conf PR = for the patch to make WITHOUT_MODULES work from the kernel config file = using makeoptions. I haven't gotten PR numbers back from the system = yet. - Ben=