Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:11:24 +0300 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>, Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr>, Fred Morcos <fred.morcos@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program Message-ID: <4FE1BDEC.1040705@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201212150.23787@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191952250.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <854D02B1-CA89-4F5E-8773-DB05F2868D74@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200618290.46371@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BtpaK2ONz2wD7Zb4Hi9W6kk7RR8_VZR8YJTj9jAEj_b4_sDaQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200716330.71176@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BtpaK0XUEBpT7SiwsY=%2BwEPgOd=TAh=Eh7fwim1Odq1jUqZag@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200854450.71564@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BtpaK0S=tsYfUhuL6BsUPu7u%2BtB47gMGGTp6Abevh0_1CaayA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201024140.40030@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CAH3a3KWy9Qzf5BOUGWM3TLZe5XV3gKz0WhWQJ1q8j9F3FV7hYg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201054480.23394@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4FE19BFC.7030304@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201212150.23787@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> >> And why you think it's not better then gcc? > > because - as you already should know - test shows otherwise. Test show only that clang-compiled binaries are still subject for improvement. It doesn't show how strict and clear this binary is. > As well as FreeBSD running predictable with gcc anyway. You mileage may vary. I'm using clang-compiled world & ports on production servers since clang was added to the ports. And nothing bad happens to me. > Still theory and ideology. That what you do too. You are stating clang is less potent only by counting speed estimates. You leave aside things like standard compliance, ease of use and healthy ecosystem. Besides, NetBSD and OpenBSD has already selected and using pcc now. And they are fine with that one. -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FE1BDEC.1040705>