Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:01:32 +0200 From: Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> To: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKs Message-ID: <8D1DF8B0-1DB7-42B5-995C-FFD059E46750@lassitu.de> In-Reply-To: <201508181237.t7ICbsEk025202@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org> References: <201508181237.t7ICbsEk025202@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Am 18.08.2015 um 14:37 schrieb Ports Index build = <indexbuild@FreeBSD.org>: > The following list includes ports maintained by you that have = duplicate > LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique > PKGNAME, e.g. by using PKGNAMESUFFIX. Note that NO_LATEST_LINK is > deprecated. See the portmgr blog post for more information: > = http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2013/10/03/package-name-collisions/ >=20 > devel/firmware-utils stb@assitu.de = =20 > graphics/pngnq stb@lassitu.de = =20 > mail/roundcube-sauserprefs stb@lassitu.de = =20 > mail/squirrelmail-login_auth-plugin stb@lassitu.de = =20 > science/py-ws2300 stb@lassitu.de = =20 > www/ttf2eot stb@lassitu.de =20 I=E2=80=99m trying to make sense of this, but having trouble. What = exactly is the problem with these ports? None of the ports use = LATEST_LINK, I believe the package names are unique, and there=E2=80=99s = no multiple ports for these that only differ in the version number. Stefan --=20 Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> Fon +49 151 14070811
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8D1DF8B0-1DB7-42B5-995C-FFD059E46750>