From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Dec 1 05:41:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA28123 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 05:41:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from caladan.tdx.co.uk (caladan.tdx.co.uk [195.188.177.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA28118 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 05:41:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kpielorz@tdx.co.uk) Received: from tdx.co.uk (lorca-tx.tdx.co.uk [195.188.177.242]) by caladan.tdx.co.uk (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA12730; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 13:37:40 GMT Message-ID: <3663F123.87550B29@tdx.co.uk> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 13:37:39 +0000 From: Karl Pielorz Organization: TDX - The Digital eXchange X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrey Tchoritch CC: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dummynet References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Andrey Tchoritch wrote: > > Is "dummynet" bandwidth manager better than ALTQ? Better? Hmmm... Tough, they both do similar things, in slightly different ways... Dummynet is quicker to setup, and gives instant results 'out the box' - From what I've seen of ALTQ, it's more comprehensive - offers more advanced features, and is also more complex to setup and configure... All I'd suggest is decide what you want/need to do - read the docs, and pick the one that does what you want accordingly... ;-) -Kp To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message