Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 08:39:50 -0500 From: John Jasen <jjasen@gmail.com> To: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.1: Intel dual port 10GbE card (82599EB) second port not present? Message-ID: <54E88AA6.3000902@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFMmRNySk6tkPtt4GX_0WvU5a2M9roo_SydZkUxzruA0JrXmTw@mail.gmail.com> References: <mailman.79.1423742401.43777.freebsd-net@freebsd.org> <54DCB8F2.5090809@gmail.com> <CAFOYbckKJWWQWVbaM0j%2BenB__du-YcgDh_YjWsA9364o339BUA@mail.gmail.com> <54E76B47.8080907@gmail.com> <CAFMmRNySk6tkPtt4GX_0WvU5a2M9roo_SydZkUxzruA0JrXmTw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, oops. That would indeed explain the behavior. Thanks! On 02/20/2015 02:02 PM, Ryan Stone wrote: > I think that you might be a bit confused about the behaviour. An ix > port will only be missing if > > a) You have a non-Intel SFP+ installed > b) hw.ix.unsupported_sfp=1 is not set in loader.conf > > ix ports that have no SFP+ installed do show up in ifconfig
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54E88AA6.3000902>