From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 11 08:04:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7362616A41F for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 08:04:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.10.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E9D43D45 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 08:04:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from xdivac02@eva.fit.vutbr.cz) (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j8B849pv046882 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:04:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id j8B849VF046881; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:04:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:04:08 +0200 From: Divacky Roman To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20050911080408.GA46725@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <20050910193211.529a7d01.polachok@narod.ru> <14711.1126370367@phk.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <14711.1126370367@phk.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 147.229.10.14 Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: comms/ltmdm and COMPAT_43 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 08:04:14 -0000 On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 06:39:27PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20050910193211.529a7d01.polachok@narod.ru>, Alexander Polakov write > s: > >I was very disappointed about the fact that comms/ltmdm doesn't > >work without COMPAT_43 in kernel. Can it be fixed? Or should I write > >to ports@freebsd.org? > > Most of our tty stuff depends on COMPAT_43 what of the tty stuff depends on COMPAT_43? I found some ioctls and then nothing.. I for one use kernel without COMPAT_43 for more than a year and havent noticed any problems... from my point of view the only serious (=widely used) consumer of COMPAT_43 is linux emulator (kern/85175 addresses this) maybe the tty stuff could be separated into some COMPAT_43_TTY and let the rest of COMPAT_43 die.. roman