Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Jul 2002 12:06:31 +0930
From:      Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        Ed Yu <edlyu@yahoo.com>
Cc:        Jud <jud@myrealbox.com>, Hostmaster@Video2Video.Com, mwvw@adelphia.net, FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.Org
Subject:   Re: What do we need in a FreeBSD desktop? (was: Peter heads back to M$FT WinBloze [support groups])
Message-ID:  <20020730023631.GI27401@wantadilla.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020730021610.25982.qmail@web20701.mail.yahoo.com>
References:  <20020729215629.435b4356.jud@myrealbox.com> <20020730021610.25982.qmail@web20701.mail.yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]

On Monday, 29 July 2002 at 19:16:10 -0700, Ed Yu wrote:
> I have used mutt and I liked it but I think for
> instant-workstation, evolution would be more
> appropriate.

Is that what you're using?  The text you send is badly broken.  I
wouldn't want to recommend that to anybody.

> I have noticed also that new users seems to prefer galeon a lot as
> well.

That's a web browser.

Greg

> --- Jud <jud@myrealbox.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 12:00:16 +0930
>> Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@lemis.com> wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>> The real
>>> problem I have is knowing which of the over 7,000
>> ports you want
>>> to install to get "basic" desktop functionality.
>> Some time ago
>>> I created the "instant-workstation" port, but
>> didn't make much
>>> noise about it.  instant-workstation basically
>> installs a number
>>> of dependent ports (see below for a list) and then
>> does some
>>> minor configuration.  Over the past couple of days
>> I've been
>>> installing a brand new machine (laptop) for a
>> friend, and I've
>>> been looking at the rough edges.  Here's what I've
>> found:
>>>
>>> 1.  Some of the dependent ports don't build
>> cleanly.  This
>>> obviously
>>>     requires some attention.
>>> 2.  "instant" is a misnomer, at least if you build
>> from source.
>>> I'm
>>>     building on a Dell Inspiron 7500 with a 600
>> MHz processor,
>>>     and it takes over 12 hours.
>>> 3.  Once it's built, it works "out of the box".
>> I've installed
>>> the
>>>     XFree86 4 port, and installation is really
>> nothing more than
>>>     this:
>>>
>>>     # X -configure
>>>     # mv /root/XF86Config.new /etc
>>>     # echo exec kdestart > ~me/.xinitrc
>>>
>>>     You can then run startx or xdm and end up in a
>> relatively
>>>     complete kde environment.
>>>
>>> So what's in instant-workstation?  Currently I
>> have:
>>>
>>> 	acroread
>>> 	bash
>>> 	cdrecord
>>> 	dos2unix
>>> 	emacs
>>> 	fetchmail
>>> 	gs
>>> 	grip
>>> 	gimp
>>> 	gv
>>> 	gpg
>>> 	ispell
>>> 	startkde
>>> 	mkisofs
>>> 	mount_smbfs
>>> 	mutt
>>> 	netscape
>>> 	xtset
>>> 	xmms
>>> 	xv
>>>
>>> My questions to you: is there anything missing?
>> Has anybody
>>> tried instant-workstation?  I'd be interested in
>> suggestions
>>> about how to improve it.
>>>
>>> Greg
>>
>> I haven't tried instant-workstation, so of course
>> I'll rush in
>> where angels fear to tread.
>>
>> One of the instant-workstation ports I have not
>> tried is mutt,
>> though I've read much praise for it and no negatives
>> that I can
>> recall.  I wonder, though, whether a gui mail
>> application might be
>> a good choice for this "target market," in addition
>> to, instead
>> of, or as another choice besides mutt.  Sylpheed
>> happens to be
>> the one I prefer, and it seems to be well liked by
>> many other
>> users.  Speaking as someone who didn't know a thing
>> about Unix a
>> couple of years ago (and hasn't improved on the
>> situation all that
>> much since:), it was very easy to learn.
>>
>> Another place where options might be appreciated is
>> browsers -
>> perhaps Galeon, Opera, Mozilla?  And Lynx I think is
>> excellent for
>> getting around on the Net at times when one doesn't
>> want to or
>> can't be in X.
>>
>> Perhaps that's taken care of by w3m (I don't
>> remember ATM whether
>> that's part of the default emacs install)?  That
>> brings me to my
>> last and likely most controversial thought.  Emacs
>> does everything
>> but bake blueberry muffins, but it might be more
>> intimidating (or
>> puzzling - took me awhile just to understand what
>> "M-x"
>> meant) than useful to someone fairly new to Unix.
>> It does take a
>> while to build and install (and download, for those
>> of us on
>> dial-ups).  And the configuration options! - not
>> exactly
>> 'instant.'  If it's part of the install, it seems to
>> me users will
>> try it, and may wind up thinking "Jeez, this stuff
>> is hard" as a
>> first impression of FreeBSD.
>>
>> HTH,
>>
>> Jud
>>
>> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of
>> the message
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
> http://health.yahoo.com
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message

--
When replying to this message, please take care not to mutilate the
original text.  
For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/email.html
Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020730023631.GI27401>