Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:08:54 -0400 From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> To: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3 Message-ID: <702FA4B9-8CEE-4C9D-86A8-157CA1E69BD7@khera.org> In-Reply-To: <20080604204325.GD4701@lava.net> References: <9B7FE91B-9C2E-4732-866C-930AC6022A40@netconsonance.com> <4846D849.2090005@FreeBSD.org> <20080604204325.GD4701@lava.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 4, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Clifton Royston wrote: > Speaking just for myself, I'd love to get a general response from > people who have run servers on both as to whether 6.3 is on average > more stable than 6.2. I really haven't gotten any clear impression as I'll throw in my "+1" for running 6.3. I have it on many boxes, some of which run gmirror and some of which have bge devices (some with both). Never any problems. They operate things varying from Postgres servers to DNS servers to mail servers (postfix) under pretty consistent load pushing lots and lots of data both network and to disk.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?702FA4B9-8CEE-4C9D-86A8-157CA1E69BD7>