From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 21 09:21:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45791106564A for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:21:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E438FC17 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm13 with SMTP id 13so3706108fxm.13 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 02:21:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=LcLzeSOnMyYSXgQGoNG9YytA2J237AZlfb+pjwci0CY=; b=MwUs+K0hLxkXPJmQlXwNrhFD6EuIofUWWpIxhRzTC1xER/buIeUiMQ9Nrqdt2jHTuU ZZ/NhL4dRbFYJdKmK7knHgyd+w1MOlqZgdCEaYpza040liXkDL46HO1t3144Lp5ykgqA Ej1yv3/tu/0Mq9kb/cce9oaS5hhJnpceKL7cI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=hdosEiZOlCqTo/uZmHCpp91wlDoT2PVo+v7mCCBYqha69oGtlifo+pk2YYMG6nHXGN fVTDg7MEMqU+4EU7/88quS744nWkE8LLY7cotrFMmhCrOZLZfh0Fl8f8ywRk3XWssluU D3xljTNhgDWPyCUKoIh9w2nOXfuQNh2TyGSXM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.193.8 with SMTP id g8mr577157hbi.21.1279704087476; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 02:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.239.160.201 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 02:21:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C46BAAD.5000507@unsane.co.uk> References: <4C452644.6060508@comclark.com> <20100720134205.3168f4f1@scorpio> <4C45EA1C.6070601@comclark.com> <20100720153209.74ec26e6@scorpio> <4C45FCE1.7010006@comclark.com> <20100720163651.0daf727d@scorpio> <4C46BAAD.5000507@unsane.co.uk> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:21:27 +0100 Message-ID: From: krad To: Vincent Hoffman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new jail utility is available. announcement. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:21:29 -0000 On 21 July 2010 10:15, Vincent Hoffman wrote: > On 21/07/2010 10:08, krad wrote: > > > > Anyone tried using it yet? Not much info out there apart from the > > announcments it seems. In my quick play with it this morning, it didnt > seem > > to be binding the ips to the jails. Not sure if you are supposed to have > the > > ip bound to the box before you use the jail. Would make sense if you did > > have to, but it would be nice if the util added it for you or at least > > prompted you if it wasnt there. > > > Not yet, when I have a spare box I might, although I quite like using > zfs for jails as you can limit the disk usage dynamically per zfs > filesystem and I didnt see any support there yet, even basic support > like there is with ezjail would be nice. > > Vince > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > i have only done preliminary tinkering and it looks ok so far (i did have to pre bind the jail ip). Might have to find a box to put freebsd 9 on and see how it works with the network stack virtualization.