Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
From:      <nik@FreeBSD.org>
To:        rfg@monkeys.com, nik@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, jlemon@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: docs/21708: kqueue/kevent man pages isn't specific about `timeout'
Message-ID:  <200106262138.f5QLcfc73315@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Synopsis: kqueue/kevent man pages isn't specific about `timeout'

State-Changed-From-To: closed->open
State-Changed-By: nik
State-Changed-When: Tue Jun 26 14:36:46 PDT 2001
State-Changed-Why: 
Jonathan, you're Mr. Kqueue :-). The question is (from a followup to the
PR)

==
The problem is that it is not specified whether the timeout is treated
as a _relative_ timespec or as an _absolute_ timespec.

Just saying that it is a timespec does not resolve the issue.

P.S.  My own experiments seem to indicate that the timeout value is
treated as being _relative_ to the present moment, i.e. the moment
at which the call to kevent(2) is actually made.
==

Comments?


Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-doc->jlemon
Responsible-Changed-By: nik
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Jun 26 14:36:46 PDT 2001
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
jlemon is Mr. kqueue

http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=21708

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200106262138.f5QLcfc73315>