Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 11:14:38 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Bill Fumerola <billf@mu.org> Cc: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/tail forward.c read.c reverse.c tail Message-ID: <3A2EF28E.288D575E@newsguy.com> References: <200012031705.eB3H5ke30393@freefall.freebsd.org> <XFMail.001204105855.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20001204202406.A64100@lucifer.bart.nl> <20001204122458.A46610@dragon.nuxi.com> <20001204143312.B75794@elvis.mu.org> <20001204123637.B46752@dragon.nuxi.com> <20001204144848.C75794@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill Fumerola wrote: > > > Diffs w/in our own CVS repo is more important, IMO. Take a poll, I think > > others will agree; but I could be wrong, so poll and find out. > > Like I've said before, I won't let the stupidity of our revision control > system weigh too heavily on getting real changes done. Reducing diffs between > BSDs is much more important then making sure we don't add a little repobloat. This has nothing to do with the specific source control tool we use. What O'brien is refering to is the ability of looking back in our own source code and see how things evolved, what changed. Each non-functional change made add to the noise, making it more difficult to identify the functional changes. That said, I think synching with other BSD is more important. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@the.great.underground.bsdconpiracy.org "The bronze landed last, which canceled that method of impartial choice." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A2EF28E.288D575E>