From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Mon Sep 14 15:56:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E12A04C1E; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:56:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CD2B151E; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:56:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from [192.168.0.23] (unknown [130.255.19.36]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F75A43C0B; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:56:44 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: svn commit: r396904 - in head/sysutils/facter: . files To: Michael Moll , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org References: <201509141545.t8EFjwbg037658@repo.freebsd.org> Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org From: John Marino Message-ID: <55F6EE31.50907@marino.st> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:56:33 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201509141545.t8EFjwbg037658@repo.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:56:58 -0000 On 9/14/2015 5:45 PM, Michael Moll wrote: > Author: mmoll > Date: Mon Sep 14 15:45:58 2015 > New Revision: 396904 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/396904 > > Log: > sysutils/facter: unbreak build on -CURRENT > > - disable -Werror until boost 1.59 gets into the portstree > - while here, correct COMMENT (noted by junovitch) How about "disable -Werror forever" ? It's past due for official policy to be set to disable -Werror by rule in ports. Maybe I should write a draft and submit to reviews to get the ball rolling. John