From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun  9 16:01:09 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D93316A41C;
	Thu,  9 Jun 2005 16:01:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mux@freebsd.org)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BFC43D49;
	Thu,  9 Jun 2005 16:01:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mux@freebsd.org)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1920)
	id EB5DA5CA0C; Thu,  9 Jun 2005 09:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:01:08 +0200
From: Maxime Henrion <mux@FreeBSD.org>
To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>, Mark Murray <markm@FreeBSD.org>,
	obrien@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20050609160108.GE14567@elvis.mu.org>
References: <200506091257.j59CvVNu043268@grovel.grondar.org>
	<42A8483B.3070001@samsco.org>
	<20050609145217.GD11313@empiric.icir.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050609145217.GD11313@empiric.icir.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: 
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc group master.passwd
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 16:01:09 -0000

Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 07:46:35AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> > >>>It's not a FreeBSD convention.  If the underscore serves no other
> > >>>purpose than satisfying an OpenBSD convention, it should go.
> > >>Agreed.
> > >Also agreed.
> > Disagreed.  It sounds like OPenBSD has a useful convention.  Even though
> > it's not the traditional FreeBSD way, it still has merit.
> 
> I also think it is useful.

So do I.  It's more trouble than it's worth to remove the leading
underscores, and I think protecting against collisions with local
usernames is a very good idea.

Maxime