From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 29 11:11:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C907B37BA5E; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:11:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id LAA26193; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:11:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:11:07 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway To: nino@inode.at Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3.4-RELEASE; panic while paging In-Reply-To: <20000329175018.V15889@TK147108.telekabel.at> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Marinos J . Yannikos wrote: > I am using 3.4-RELEASE (no patches) on an Athlon 600 / FIC SD11 system. > So far I have experienced: > - 1 spontaneous reboot > - several sig 10/sig 11 errors while compiling the kernel > - 2 kernel panics while paging, the message was "supervisor read - page not > present, IIRC". Apparently the kernel ran out of swap, but I doubt that > this was the only reason. 3.4-RELEASE seems rock-stable on my K6-3/400 > system. > > Does anyone use the above configuration without problems? I am using very > conservative SDRAM timings and brand 6ns PC100 SDRAM. Could this be a sign > of a bad power supply, or do these things happen with 3.4-RELEASE because > of a bug? It's almost certainly a hardware problem, given the random nature of your problems. Try running a make buildworld -j16 or something stressful - if it can't handle the load, it's probably bad hardware. Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message