From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 16 23:23:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3820A16A4D1 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:23:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rizzo@icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBACB13C465 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:23:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rizzo@icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.11/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0GNNtZ4011078; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:23:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.3/Submit) id l0GNNt3k011077; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:23:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:23:55 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Pietro Cerutti Message-ID: <20070116152355.A11065@xorpc.icir.org> References: <20070116010645.A94849@xorpc.icir.org> <20070116193722.fee4defe.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> <20070116110935.A8351@xorpc.icir.org> <20070116221441.9afd899a.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> <20070116134513.A9739@xorpc.icir.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com on Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 11:41:22PM +0100 Cc: Torfinn Ingolfsen , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can we resurrect linux-firefox-1.5 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:23:58 -0000 On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 11:41:22PM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 1/16/07, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > > So i am just advocating to keep the "stable" version around while > > the "current" one becomes stable enough. > > You can get that port back to a specific date (e.g. with > sysutils/portdowngrade) and reinstall the version which better applies > your needs. which is what i did - but it is an annoyance and not something that the average user wants/knows how to do. That is the reason why we have -stable and -current after all. luigi