From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 6 15:42:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3E19E88; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 15:42:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [82.95.125.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BB2217E2; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 15:42:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl ([192.168.42.3]) by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id rB6Fgn53087325; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 16:42:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 06 Dec 2013 16:42:49 +0100 Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 16:42:49 +0100 From: "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" To: chrish@UltimateDNS.NET Subject: Re: [games/ofortune] CFT and pending issues Message-ID: <20131206154249.GB78659@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> References: <20131205215437.GA32134@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> <20131206133709.GA60741@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> <0de1dbb77b9352e1546e777dbed1fee9.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0de1dbb77b9352e1546e777dbed1fee9.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/~fonz/fonz_pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 15:42:52 -0000 --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable chrish@UltimateDNS.NET wrote: >> Should the Makefile define LICENSE? If so, what should it be (BSD I >> presume) and should LICENSE_FILE be defined as well? >=20 > Given that it /used/ to be part of *BSD. Maybe the (current) BSD license, > or the MIT 3-clause would be most appropriate. Sounds like a good idea. Would I be right in saying that just LICENSE=3DBSD is sufficient, i.e. I don't need to specify LICENSE_FILE? AvW --=20 I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example. --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSofB5AAoJEAfP7gJTaCe8nb8QAMS23Dauj1y1XJIbSsycYicc S1OMkXKHYKQ1DNry1aAL3eejb4jNDwJzGL9yhtfq0EQ9ZZpvxBJAe8MQvV2zID3t hptjBJHlou0JNPBSJs8eNS92dLvdVj+qpJ3loulLlivKiJbH8SCGprr7b2oDJ5fS rJ1j2y//3DlcDnbtbVyupga8jzP+0YG77162FZ/DZAXHM33ivI76LwuIFqocNaxY dlgWm/R08EyIXka/3uwg+5szOmHna3h7twpovYGjJII+ORWaYMmM7MgxedwfZt0r X06gAqCECh091F/bM2PwEPpf/Bso3qvWYEPqFx/GUiKBmLMfiwmh0UJi52bUUw/W aicwNKhrNNQUyqQTgW+ePoZG2ErmfvIIi7TpjRSmPQDHn/5BXTLUfx6b3ktFLUZ8 tlwD3tiQLaC+wssbSJ3ZU/4N5UFnQo66VWLNEWeP0YeIttKCx/yUH+3gSwqn+Z1J 5y5LiiY3tcUsuDD8mGDVzM+i/1hRhgR2OJKCcs4w+3tTNsevLxj8u0ZUR3VJUDQR YRFlOp9kPmh4EqLGGH0LpY/ZETGyB2X3OISlBd+7M1amrga9eNlvg84A7cqaSQ6I OPuUcWe8tadejGHW8xjHGCCNIolDAm263Fcu9nHZM+sMn8CSjcBBsanEahdKS7f5 bvdNSO13q40FhcyU5nHJ =beIW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4--