From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 20 14:32:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from green.homeunix.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEAF316A4CE; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:32:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from green.homeunix.org (green@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.homeunix.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAKEWlld092850; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 09:32:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from green@green.homeunix.org) Received: (from green@localhost) by green.homeunix.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iAKEWjB7092662; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 09:32:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from green) Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 09:32:43 -0500 From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman To: Norikatsu Shigemura Message-ID: <20041120143243.GF64033@green.homeunix.org> References: <200411201420.iAKEK7q2053614@sakura.ninth-nine.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200411201420.iAKEK7q2053614@sakura.ninth-nine.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:40:39 +0000 cc: itetcu@people.tecnik93.com cc: krion@FreeBSD.org cc: kde@FreeBSD.org cc: nick@netdot.net cc: Lars.Koeller@Uni-Bielefeld.DE cc: ume@FreeBSD.org cc: thierry@FreeBSD.org cc: tremere@cainites.net cc: adamw@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: sem@FreeBSD.org cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org cc: demon@FreeBSD.org cc: mwicks@kettering.edu cc: bms@FreeBSD.org cc: gh@ghaering.de Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] status of databases/sqlite* is too bad. X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:32:49 -0000 On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 11:20:07PM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > Hi sqlite and ports depending on itself maintainers. > > Status of databases/sqlite* is too bad. > > databases/Makefile > +- databases/sqlite SQLite 2.8.14 > | databases/sqlite2 SQLite 2.8.14 > +- databases/sqlite3 SQLite 3.0.5 > > The first, sqlite2 is not connect to ports system. The > secound, sqlite3 is not repocopy-ed from sqlite. > > > I think that we should do following things. How about? > > 1. databases/sqlite should be updated to 3.x. > Of course, ports depending on sqlite(*) or sqlite3 must > chase library version bump and dependency. And some > ports depending on sqlite2 change dependency on to > databases/sqlite2. > > 2. databases/sqlite2 sould be connected to ports system. > > 3. databases/sqlite3 sould be removed from ports system. > > (*) sqlite 3.x has a compatibility to sqlite 2.x API. But > we know that some applications are only depended on sqlite2 > (API? or format?) like mail/popfile(please read > /usr/ports/UPDATING#20041024 matsushita's report). > So we should confirm that these are depended on sqlite3. > For the time, I'll change all dependency on to sqlite2. > > If these are OK, I'll commit these change. This is exactly what I've been planning to do but repeatedly sidetracked by lots of Real Life events. The whole process isn't very involved, it just needs to be done in a consistent order, and what you have proposed looks quite correct. -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\