Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 03 Jun 2005 17:03:28 +0400
From:      Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>
To:        fandino@ng.fadesa.es
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: kadmin (heimdal port) ignores the ldap backend
Message-ID:  <41916239@srv.sem.ipt.ru>
In-Reply-To: <42A025CA.2000107@ng.fadesa.es> (fandino@ng.fadesa.es's message of "Fri, 03 Jun 2005 11:41:30 %2B0200")
References:  <429D8B3B.50203@ng.fadesa.es> <29469499@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <429DE188.5020908@ng.fadesa.es> <09783236@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <429EE7D8.4050900@ng.fadesa.es> <65121725@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <42A025CA.2000107@ng.fadesa.es>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 03 Jun 2005 11:41:30 +0200 fandino wrote:

> Boris Samorodov wrote:
> >>I removed temporally all /usr/lib/libkadm5srv* libraries and as results
> >>kadmin was forced to load /usr/local libraries, but I get the same
> >>problem :-(
> > 
> >>again kadmin doesn't use ldap and fallback to database files.
> > From your dump:
> >  58516 kadmin   CALL  access(0x28079000,0)
> >  58516 kadmin   NAMI  "/usr/lib/libhdb.so.7"
> >  58516 kadmin   RET   access 0
> >  58516 kadmin   CALL  open(0x28076040,0,0xbfbfebcc)
> >  58516 kadmin   NAMI  "/usr/lib/libhdb.so.7"
> >  58516 kadmin   RET   open 3
> >  58516 kadmin   CALL  fstat(0x3,0xbfbfebcc)
> >  58516 kadmin   RET   fstat 0
> >  58516 kadmin   CALL  read(0x3,0x28070c40,0x1000)
> >  58516 kadmin   GIO   fd 3 read 4096 bytes
> > Thus kadmin is using the system libhdb. The port version shuold be
> > at
> > /usr/local/lib.

> Effectively /usr/lib/libhdb.so.7 was the cause of the problem. Thank you Boris.

You are welcome.

> I'd like to ask what is the proper way of treat with this conflict?

So do I.

> is it unavoidable?

The same.

> is there any solution?

I already gave you a skeleton of the wrapping script for kadmin with
search-order changed for libraries. IMO it's the most effective way at
the matter.

Does someone know the right solution?

> Also it'd be interesting if a warning was printed by the port install script
> advising the consequences of enable "LDAP backend" in the heimdal port.

Please, do send-pr with your suggestion.


WBR
-- 
bsam



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41916239>