Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 22:45:57 -0700 From: Nick Sayer <nsayer@quack.kfu.com> To: Assar Westerlund <assar@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/secure/lib/libtelnet Makefile Message-ID: <3ACC0695.4010603@quack.kfu.com> References: <200104050037.f350b7t89955@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Assar Westerlund wrote: > assar 2001/04/04 17:37:07 PDT > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) > secure/lib/libtelnet Makefile > Log: > MFC: 1.19: disable RSA > > Approved by: jkh > > Revision Changes Path > 1.17.2.1 +2 -2 src/secure/lib/libtelnet/Makefile > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/secure/lib/libtelnet/Makefile.diff?r1=1.17&r2=1.17.2.1 1. It's SRA, not RSA. 2. Why was this necessary? What is so harmful about leaving SRA in? SRA was not the most secure thing in the world, but it's certainly more secure than plaintext. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3ACC0695.4010603>