Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1996 23:43:24 -0600 (MDT) From: Dave Andersen <angio@aros.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: gpalmer@freebsd.org, thekind@NETural.com Subject: Re: SCSI RAID controller support? Message-ID: <199604180543.XAA15760@shell.aros.net> In-Reply-To: <199604172259.PAA02918@phaeton.artisoft.com> from Terry Lambert at "Apr 17, 96 03:59:37 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lo and behold, Terry Lambert once said: > > I'm surprised that you need RAID for web serving at all. You'd need a > > VERY high hit rate, or be pumping out large documents to need such > > access speed. > > What? What makes you think RAID is faster? It's slower, without > hardware acceleration (like an NVRAM write cache). You have to do > two writes for each write, otherwise... > > If he wants addes speed, he should use striping with spindel-sync, > not RAID. > > RAID is for fault tolerance and error recovery. That depends entirely on the level of RAID you're using. You can use RAID for fault tolerance, -or- for disk striping, or both. RAID 0: Striping, no parity. Not true "raid" but often sold as it. RAID 1: Mirroring on two disks - redundancy - same speed as a normal drive (in theory. :) The ECC may slow things down. RAID 2: Hamming ECC - basically for data redundancy About as fast as raid 1, perhaps a bit faster. RAID 3: Striping with parity checking A bit more reliable than RAID 0, not quite as fast, but still considerably faster than a straight disk RAID 4: Parity Checking on a special parity disk. RAID 5: Parity checking with parity distributed across data disks Quite obviously, RAID 0 and RAID 3 have the potential to be considerably faster than an ordinary disk. I don't know how they compare to software striping as in the ccd, I don't think anyone's done any comparisons.:) I've used some of these in graphic design applications, and they *really* fly. A RAID level 0 array like the FWB Jackhammer is a very pretty piece of equipment, though a tad expensive for most people. :) Granted that RAID 0 isn't really "R"aid in the sense that it isn't redundant, but even RAID 3 is faster than a standalone disk (and has the advantage of redundancy), and many manufacturers sell striped non-redundant disk arrays as RAID drives. -Dave Andersen -- angio@aros.net Complete virtual hosting and business-oriented system administration Internet services. (WWW, FTP, email) http://www.aros.net/ http://www.aros.net/about/virtual "There are only two industries that refer to thier customers as 'users'."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604180543.XAA15760>