Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:58:10 +0200 From: Gerrit =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChn?= <gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> To: pyunyh@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: broken re(4) Message-ID: <20080612085810.072d705d.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> In-Reply-To: <20080612032228.GD7250@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20080527165232.2acbb00f.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <3C916EEA-5A2B-4C88-B834-0F47D7D525FA@gmail.com> <20080611092457.82c83083.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <20080612032228.GD7250@cdnetworks.co.kr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:22:28 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> wrote about Re: broken re(4): PY> Before checking performance of network controller you had to rule PY> out other factors like disk I/O. Use one of benchmark programs in PY> ports/benchmark. I already did simple benchmarking by using "dd if=/dev/zero of=file" which gave me several 10s of MByte/s under all circumstances. Can you recommend one of the benchmarking programs for more detailed testing? cu Gerrit
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080612085810.072d705d.gerrit>