Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 06:37:19 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> To: Mikle Krutov <nekoexmachina@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: More stable and reliable NTFS driver for read-only access? Message-ID: <20100705133719.GA24489@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimxlLCBKAcfyYiRyE-lJDjuz5nQ-6LWxjHArZXY@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTimxlLCBKAcfyYiRyE-lJDjuz5nQ-6LWxjHArZXY@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 01:24:19PM +0000, Mikle Krutov wrote: > Which ntfs driver is more reliable, stable > and fast for read-only access, ntfs-3g or > kernel one? > Never ever had a contact with ntfs on > fbsd, and friend of mine asks to backup > his data to my machine (from ntfs hdd, > formated in vista, if it makes any > difference) I remember there being a thread last year sometime about the possibility of NTFS support removed from the kernel due to its age, but I forget what the outcome was. You're probably better off using something from ports, possibly with fuse. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100705133719.GA24489>