Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:47:53 +0200
From:      Jonathan Weiss <tomonage2@gmx.de>
To:        <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   AW: alternative options for ports
Message-ID:  <BD943409.CB95%tomonage2@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <200410141332.27469.josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> El Jueves, 14 de Octubre de 2004 13:20, Jose M Rodriguez escribi=F3:
>> El Jueves, 14 de Octubre de 2004 11:53, Sergei Kolobov escribi=F3:
>>> On 2004-10-14 at 00:54 +0200, Sebastian Schulze Struchtrup wrote:
>>>> I thought of a way to specify configurations to build several
> [ ... ]
>>>=20
>>> FLAVOURS=3D gtk kde athena
>>>=20
>>> which produces the corresponding vim-gtk, vim-kde, and vim-athena
>>> packages from a *signle* port, without a need to create a multitude
>>> of slave ports.
>>>=20
>>> Is there anybody working to bring this feature in our bsd.port.mk?
>>>=20
>>> Sergei
>>=20
>> It not so esay.  OpenBSD port system is binary oriented (And I think
>> NetBSD pkgsrc also).  Even installing from ports, they make first de
>> package and then install.
>>=20
>=20
> It must say:
>=20
> It's not so easy.  OpenBSD ports system is binary oriented (like rpm and
> NetBSD pkgsrc, I think).  Even installing from ports, they make first a
> package and then install from that.

BTW, I like this approach much more!
Make a package out of the port and then install it, it is much more
meaningful .

Also the 'make package' target in OpenBSD does not install the package as i=
n
FreeBSD, also more meaningful .

Greets,
Jonathan





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BD943409.CB95%tomonage2>