From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 16 10:27:39 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C6C16A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:27:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr (lara.cc.fer.hr [161.53.72.113])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD9243D48
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:27:38 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.cc.fer.hr [127.0.0.1])
	by lara.cc.fer.hr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAGARNV4020426
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:27:23 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr)
Message-ID: <4199D60A.2010208@fer.hr>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:27:22 +0100
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041111)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: current@freebsd.org
References: <32653.1100366976@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: <32653.1100366976@critter.freebsd.dk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Passwd format?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:27:39 -0000

Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

>>It seems it's definitely NOT reusable in LDAP :(
> 
> 
> Why not ?
> 
> Cisco uses it in their routers, Juniper uses it in their routers.
> It's used in Flash animations, FreeBSD systems and Linux systems
> alike.

As others pointed out, I'm probably wrong on that :) I thought LDAP 
passwords are just plain hashes of plaintext passwords, but it seems 
it's not so.

Thanks, all!