From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 6 13:48:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54B8116A41C; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:48:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Received: from luzifer.incubus.de (incubus.de [80.237.207.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E350143D4C; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:48:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Received: from [192.168.2.10] (p54AAFA96.dip.t-dialin.net [84.170.250.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luzifer.incubus.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2EB30DD6; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:51:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42A454AF.3010908@incubus.de> Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:50:39 +0200 From: Matthias Buelow User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050526) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxi Combina References: <285af087050603095356601a3d@mail.gmail.com> <200506061249.j56Cn1vd018910@lurza.secnetix.de> <285af08705060606255e26aa5b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <285af08705060606255e26aa5b@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 OpenPGP: id=6FF22C9F; url=http://www.mkbuelow.net/mkbkeys Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: filesystems not properly unmounted [OT] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 13:48:22 -0000 Maxi Combina wrote: > companies, etc) to move to an open source OS, we must do an effort. I > think that there are a lot of linux distros out there that are really > easy to use, and even more "friendly" or "beatiful" than windows. > I dont think that FreeBSD has achieved this. I dont think there is > need. FreeBSD is more suitable for a server station, but not for the > desktop. I use linux both as server and desktop with excelent results. If you want a Unix desktop, like most likely many people on this mailing list want, or need, you can use FreeBSD aswell as Linux but not Windows (even with things like UWin or Cygwin, it's a pain). I don't understand this "we need to compete with Windows on the desktop" thing. I've never considered Windows to be particularly useful as a desktop environment, why should the Unix systems compete with it? [And btw., please let's move this discussion to -advocacy, since it doesn't really belong on this list.] mkb.