From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Sat Feb 6 01:12:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8BBA9EEA9 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 01:12:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from phabric-backend.rbsd.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2607:fc50:2000:101::1bb:73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A690DC3 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 01:12:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by phabric-backend.rbsd.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 56AE76B86; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 01:12:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 01:12:31 +0000 To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org From: "sepherosa_gmail.com (Sepherosa Ziehau)" Reply-to: D5185+333+b2354430ad09b93f@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D5185: tcp/lro: Allow network drivers to set the limit for TCP ACK/data segment aggregation limit Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D5185: tcp/lro: Allow network drivers to set the limit for TCP ACK/data segment aggregation limit X-Herald-Rules: <64> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NTU0NmM0Mjk2NjdmNzVhNmM3MzlkMWQyNTdmIFa1SH8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2016 01:12:31 -0000 sepherosa_gmail.com added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS sys/netinet/tcp_lro.h:94 My intention here is too keep the size of lro_ctrl unchanged on amd64 (I think there is an implicit 4 bytes padding after lro_mbuf_max :). But I am fine to change them into unsigned int. Does anyone know any drawbacks to change these two fields into unsigned int? If not, I would change them into unsigned int after Chinese New Year :) REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5185 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, hselasky, np, transport, gallatin, adrian, network Cc: freebsd-virtualization-list, freebsd-net-list