From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 25 16:53: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n37.san.rr.com (dt051n37.san.rr.com [204.210.32.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9276337B423 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 16:53:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@DougBarton.net) Received: from DougBarton.net (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n37.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA31089; Fri, 25 May 2001 16:52:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@DougBarton.net) Message-ID: <3B0EF049.965539CC@DougBarton.net> Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 16:52:41 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: chad@DCFinc.com Cc: Kevin Oberman , bayers@yahoo.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2cd Attempt - Problems From 4.1 to 4.x References: <200105251635.JAA18220@freeway.dcfinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Chad R. Larson" wrote: > > As I recall, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > The transition from current to stable is not an > > upgrade and I can easily believe that CVSUP might leave a few bits and > > pieces in the tree that you don't want. > > I'd be disturbed to learn that CVSup didn't do the right thing in > /usr/src when changing update tags. It's questionable in this situation what the "right thing" would be. There is no reason not to remove /usr/src before changing branches, so it's good advice to do it. Doug -- I need someone really bad. Are you really bad? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message