From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 06:41:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4238F16A4CE; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:41:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ares.wolfpond.org (ns1.wolfpond.org [62.212.96.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1AFD43D2F; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:41:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ftigeot@wolfpond.org) Received: from aoi.wolfpond.org (aoi.wolfpond.org [IPv6:2001:7a8:24db:1:20c:76ff:feb4:27e1]) by ares.wolfpond.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j386fHGX055174; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:41:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ftigeot@aoi.wolfpond.org) Received: from aoi.wolfpond.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aoi.wolfpond.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j386fNVk047543; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:41:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ftigeot@aoi.wolfpond.org) Received: (from ftigeot@localhost) by aoi.wolfpond.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j386fM42047542; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:41:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ftigeot) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:41:22 +0200 From: Francois Tigeot To: David Xu Message-ID: <20050408064122.GC45371@aoi.wolfpond.org> References: <425564D9.5050504@LogicX.us> <4255DC88.6060608@freebsd.org> <4255E04B.6020601@LogicX.us> <4255E43C.8010804@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4255E43C.8010804@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Mike Schroll cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: subversion-1.1.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 06:41:22 -0000 On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 09:54:04AM +0800, David Xu wrote: > I heard only -O works, -O2 does not work, -Os sometimes is a higher > optimization > level than -O2. AFAIK, -Os is only a subset of -O2. -Os only includes the -O2 optimisations which don't increase code size; it gives generally better performance than -O2 due to a better cache footprint. I have found this particularly true when using VIA C3 processors. -- Francois Tigeot