From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 27 18:15:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87853106566B for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:15:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411E98FC0C for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:15:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [96.47.65.170]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBBF146B2D; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:15:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 456DDB96F; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:15:45 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Kostik Belousov Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:02:58 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p10; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <5EDB646F-513F-411A-ABBC-6DA555D2EAC6@averesystems.com> <201201271742.q0RHgwGS091009@ambrisko.com> <20120127175218.GC2726@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20120127175218.GC2726@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201271302.59011.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:15:45 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Andrew Boyer Subject: Re: knlist_empty locking fix X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:15:46 -0000 On Friday, January 27, 2012 12:52:18 pm Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:42:58AM -0800, Doug Ambrisko wrote: > > Andrew Boyer writes: > > | On Jan 27, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Doug Ambrisko wrote: > > | > > | > John Baldwin writes: > > | > | Agreed, I think the missing locking should just be added to the aio code. > > | > > > | > Okay so then just: > > | > > > | > Index: vfs_aio.c > > | > =================================================================== > > | > RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/freebsd/src/sys/kern/vfs_aio.c,v > > | > retrieving revision 1.243.2.3.4.1 > > | > diff -u -p -r1.243.2.3.4.1 vfs_aio.c > > | > --- vfs_aio.c 21 Dec 2010 17:09:25 -0000 1.243.2.3.4.1 > > | > +++ vfs_aio.c 27 Jan 2012 17:07:11 -0000 > > | > @@ -2509,9 +2509,12 @@ static void > > | > filt_aiodetach(struct knote *kn) > > | > { > > | > struct aiocblist *aiocbe = kn->kn_ptr.p_aio; > > | > + struct knlist *knl = &aiocbe->klist; > > | > > > | > - if (!knlist_empty(&aiocbe->klist)) > > | > - knlist_remove(&aiocbe->klist, kn, 0); > > | > + knl->kl_lock(knl->kl_lockarg); > > | > + if (!knlist_empty(knl)) > > | > + knlist_remove(knl, kn, 1); > > | > + knl->kl_unlock(knl->kl_lockarg); > > | > } > > | > > > | > /* kqueue filter function */ > > | > > > | > I was trying to be consistant with knlist_remove but this is a much > > | > smaller change that can be merge to older branches. > > | > > | Does filt_liodetach() need the same treatment? > > > > Yes, I had that in the original. I updated that and optimized > > the knl to just get the structure needed. > > > > Index: vfs_aio.c > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/freebsd/src/sys/kern/vfs_aio.c,v > > retrieving revision 1.243.2.3.4.1 > > diff -u -p -r1.243.2.3.4.1 vfs_aio.c > > --- vfs_aio.c 21 Dec 2010 17:09:25 -0000 1.243.2.3.4.1 > > +++ vfs_aio.c 27 Jan 2012 17:35:47 -0000 > > @@ -2508,10 +2508,12 @@ filt_aioattach(struct knote *kn) > > static void > > filt_aiodetach(struct knote *kn) > > { > > - struct aiocblist *aiocbe = kn->kn_ptr.p_aio; > > + struct knlist *knl = &kn->kn_ptr.p_aio->klist; > > > > - if (!knlist_empty(&aiocbe->klist)) > > - knlist_remove(&aiocbe->klist, kn, 0); > > + knl->kl_lock(knl->kl_lockarg); > > + if (!knlist_empty(knl)) > > + knlist_remove(knl, kn, 1); > > + knl->kl_unlock(knl->kl_lockarg); > > } > > > > /* kqueue filter function */ > > @@ -2553,10 +2555,12 @@ filt_lioattach(struct knote *kn) > > static void > > filt_liodetach(struct knote *kn) > > { > > - struct aioliojob * lj = kn->kn_ptr.p_lio; > > + struct knlist *knl = &kn->kn_ptr.p_lio->klist; > It is easy to be style-compiant there and move initialization of knl > after the blank line. > > Do you need two different functions now ? I think you can leave just one. Hmm, I think p_lio != p_aio, so two functions are required. I think the patch looks fine. The style fix to not assign 'knl' in its declaration would be nice to fix as you suggested, but that's minor. -- John Baldwin