Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 08:46:49 -0400 From: Lee Dilkie <lee@dilkie.com> To: Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl>, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>, "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@yandex-team.ru> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Luigi Rizzo <luigi@freebsd.org>, "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ipfw <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [CFT] new tables for ipfw Message-ID: <53ECAFB9.50507@dilkie.com> In-Reply-To: <53ECA6B2.8010003@digiware.nl> References: <53EBC687.9050503@yandex-team.ru> <CA%2BhQ2%2Bg=A_rLHCVpBqn0AtFLu_gNGtzbmXvc-7JhpLqPSWw44A@mail.gmail.com> <53EC880B.3020903@yandex-team.ru> <CA%2BhQ2%2BiPPhy47eN0=KaSYBaNMdObY20yko7dRY1MMuP_mfnmOQ@mail.gmail.com> <53EC960A.1030603@yandex-team.ru> <CA%2BhQ2%2BgxVYmXb%2BHOw4qUm6tykmEvBRkrV0RhZsnC6B08FLKvdA@mail.gmail.com> <53ECA6B2.8010003@digiware.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/14/2014 08:08, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > I've found the notation ipnr:something rather frustrating when using > ipv6 addresses. Sort of like typing a ipv6 address in a browser, the > last :xx is always interpreted as portnumber, UNLESS you wrap it in []'s. > compare > 2001:4cb8:3:1::1 > 2001:4cb8:3:1::1:80 > [2001:4cb8:3:1::1]:80 > The first and the last are the same host but a different port, the > middle one is just a different host. > > Could/should we do the same in ipfw? the first and second forms are valid, but as ipv6 addresses *with no port*, The third is an ipv6 address with a port. If the intent of the second form is an address and port, it will not be parsed that way by standard parsers and violates the ivp6 addressing rfc's. -lee
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53ECAFB9.50507>