Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:08:57 +0100
From:      Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Max Brazhnikov <makc@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, beat@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk
Message-ID:  <4CF610A9.7030102@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <201012011153.54064.makc@freebsd.org>
References:  <201012010832.oB18WoDm097939@repoman.freebsd.org> <201012011153.54064.makc@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2010/12/01 09:53, Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:32:50 +0000 (UTC), Martin Wilke wrote:
>> miwi        2010-12-01 08:32:50 UTC
>>
>>    FreeBSD ports repository
>>
>>    Modified files:
>>      Mk                   bsd.port.mk
>>    Log:
>>    - Remove two checks obviated by the removal of _OPTIONSFILE in revision
>> 1.596 [1] - Remove Legacy USE_BISON in bsd.port.mk [2]
>>    - Remove Legacy 2004 Hack in bsd.port.mk [3]
>>
>>    - CONFLICT handling in has been reworked. There are two new variables in
>> bsd.ports.mk: - CONFLICTS_BUILDS: Check for conflicts prior to build
>>      - CONFLICTS_INSTALL: Check for conflicts prior to installation stage
>>
>>        The existing CONFLICTS checks for conflicts prior to build and
>> installation stage. Users could defer the conflict check of
>> CONFLICTS_BUILDS and CONFLICTS to the installation stage by using
>> DEFER_CONFLICTS_CHECK. As already possible with CONFLICTS the new conflict
>> checks could be disabled by using DISABLE_CONFLICTS. This patch was
>> submitted by beat@
>
> Thanks! One comment on the patch:
>
>   .if defined(CONFLICTS)&&  !defined(DISABLE_CONFLICTS)
>   PKG_ARGS+=		-C "${CONFLICTS}"
>   .endif
> +.if defined(CONFLICTS_BUILD)&&  !defined(DISABLE_CONFLICTS)
> +PKG_ARGS+=		-C "${CONFLICTS_BUILD}"
> +.endif
> +.if defined(CONFLICTS_INSTALL)&&  !defined(DISABLE_CONFLICTS)
> +PKG_ARGS+=		-C "${CONFLICTS_INSTALL}"
> +.endif
>   .endif
>   .if defined(PKG_NOCOMPRESS)
>   PKG_SUFX?=		.tar
>
> It seems for me that CONFLICTS_BUILD is needless for packages and can be
> removed.

Don't think so. CONFLICTS_BUILD just changes the moment the check is 
performed, but the meaning remains.

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
               <pav@FreeBSD.org>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CF610A9.7030102>