Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Jan 1999 17:51:36 -0200 (EDT)
From:      Joao Carlos Mendes Luis <jonny@jonny.eng.br>
To:        julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer)
Cc:        jonny@jonny.eng.br, asami@cs.berkeley.edu, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: softupdates on /
Message-ID:  <199901281951.RAA26420@roma.coe.ufrj.br>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901281130220.304-100000@s204m82.isp.whistle.com> from Julian Elischer at "Jan 28, 1999 11:30:45 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
#define quoting(Julian Elischer)
// On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Joao Carlos Mendes Luis wrote:
// > Is there a strong reason for softupdates be a tunefs option, instead of
// > a mount option ?  This could be easily solved by a
//
// kirk has convinsing arguments against it and "He's the man"
                       ^^^^^^^^^

I got your point, but can you list these arguments ?  If it's only "he
wants it this way, god only knows why", it's allright, but if there's
a technical reason, I'd like to know.

Thanks in advance,

					Jonny

--
Joao Carlos Mendes Luis            M.Sc. Student
jonny@jonny.eng.br                 Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
"This .sig is not meant to be politically correct."

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901281951.RAA26420>