From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 03:13:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264F5106564A for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 03:13:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from syso.fml@no-route.org) Received: from core.kel1.no-route.org (core.kel1.no-route.org [217.70.192.207]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6DE8FC1C for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 03:13:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from syso.fml@no-route.org) Received: from blowfish.kel.no-route.org (unknown [10.0.0.222]) by core.kel1.no-route.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6313D1DDAFE for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 04:57:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <49D0274A.80807@no-route.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 03:58:34 +0200 From: Sylwester Sosnowski User-Agent: some piece of software MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: dd(1) support for SIGUSR1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 03:13:21 -0000 Hello, At least in FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE dd(1) doesn't seem to support the USR1 signal. Instead of using the SIGUSR1 signal it supports the SIGINFO signal. For compatibility reasons I would appreciate SIGUSR1 support beside of SIGINFO support. Or is there any reason not to use it? Regards, Sylwester